YES(?,O(1)) * Step 1: TrivialSCCs WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(0) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(1 + A) [1 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2 && 0 >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,1);(f13,1);(f5,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{1,2,3},2->{},3->{}] + Applied Processor: TrivialSCCs + Details: All trivial SCCs of the transition graph admit timebound 1. * Step 2: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(0) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(1 + A) [1 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2 && 0 >= 1 + B] (1,1) 3. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2] (1,1) Signature: {(f0,1);(f13,1);(f5,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{1,2,3},2->{},3->{}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,2),(0,3)] * Step 3: AddSinks WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(0) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(1 + A) [1 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2 && 0 >= 1 + B] (1,1) 3. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2] (1,1) Signature: {(f0,1);(f13,1);(f5,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2,3},2->{},3->{}] + Applied Processor: AddSinks + Details: () * Step 4: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(0) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(1 + A) [1 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2 && 0 >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2] (?,1) 4. f5(A) -> exitus616(A) True (?,1) Signature: {(exitus616,1);(f0,1);(f13,1);(f5,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2,3,4},1->{1,2,3,4},2->{},3->{},4->{}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,2),(0,3)] * Step 5: LooptreeTransformer WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(0) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(1 + A) [1 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2 && 0 >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2] (?,1) 4. f5(A) -> exitus616(A) True (?,1) Signature: {(exitus616,1);(f0,1);(f13,1);(f5,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,4},1->{1,2,3,4},2->{},3->{},4->{}] + Applied Processor: LooptreeTransformer + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4] | `- p:[1] c: [1] * Step 6: SizeAbstraction WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: (Rules: 0. f0(A) -> f5(0) True (1,1) 1. f5(A) -> f5(1 + A) [1 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2 && 0 >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. f5(A) -> f13(A) [A >= 2] (?,1) 4. f5(A) -> exitus616(A) True (?,1) Signature: {(exitus616,1);(f0,1);(f13,1);(f5,1)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,4},1->{1,2,3,4},2->{},3->{},4->{}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4] | `- p:[1] c: [1]) + Applied Processor: SizeAbstraction UseCFG Minimize + Details: () * Step 7: FlowAbstraction WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [A,0.0] f0 ~> f5 [A <= 0*K] f5 ~> f5 [A <= K + A] f5 ~> f13 [A <= A] f5 ~> f13 [A <= A] f5 ~> exitus616 [A <= A] + Loop: [0.0 <= 2*K + A] f5 ~> f5 [A <= K + A] + Applied Processor: FlowAbstraction + Details: () * Step 8: LareProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [tick,huge,K,A,0.0] f0 ~> f5 [K ~=> A] f5 ~> f5 [A ~+> A,K ~+> A] f5 ~> f13 [] f5 ~> f13 [] f5 ~> exitus616 [] + Loop: [A ~+> 0.0,K ~*> 0.0] f5 ~> f5 [A ~+> A,K ~+> A] + Applied Processor: LareProcessor + Details: f0 ~> exitus616 [K ~=> A,tick ~+> tick,K ~+> A,K ~+> 0.0,K ~+> tick,K ~*> A,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] f0 ~> f13 [K ~=> A,tick ~+> tick,K ~+> A,K ~+> 0.0,K ~+> tick,K ~*> A,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] + f5> [A ~+> A,A ~+> 0.0,A ~+> tick,tick ~+> tick,K ~+> A,A ~*> A,K ~*> A,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] YES(?,O(1))