YES(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: UnsatRules WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 1. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [B >= 1 + A && A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 2. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [A >= 1 + B && B >= A] (?,1) 3. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True (1,1) Signature: {(eval,2);(start,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,1,2,3},1->{0,1,2,3},2->{0,1,2,3},3->{0,1,2,3},4->{0,1,2,3}] + Applied Processor: UnsatRules + Details: Following transitions have unsatisfiable constraints and are removed: [1,2] * Step 2: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True (1,1) Signature: {(eval,2);(start,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,3},3->{0,3},4->{0,3}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,3),(3,0)] * Step 3: AddSinks WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True (1,1) Signature: {(eval,2);(start,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{0},3->{3},4->{0,3}] + Applied Processor: AddSinks + Details: () * Step 4: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True (1,1) 5. eval(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True (?,1) Signature: {(eval,2);(exitus616,2);(start,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,3,5},3->{0,3,5},4->{0,3,5},5->{}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,3),(3,0)] * Step 5: LooptreeTransformer WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True (1,1) 5. eval(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True (?,1) Signature: {(eval,2);(exitus616,2);(start,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,5},3->{3,5},4->{0,3,5},5->{}] + Applied Processor: LooptreeTransformer + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,3,4,5] | +- p:[3] c: [3] | `- p:[0] c: [0] * Step 6: SizeAbstraction WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: (Rules: 0. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True (1,1) 5. eval(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True (?,1) Signature: {(eval,2);(exitus616,2);(start,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,5},3->{3,5},4->{0,3,5},5->{}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,3,4,5] | +- p:[3] c: [3] | `- p:[0] c: [0]) + Applied Processor: SizeAbstraction UseCFG Minimize + Details: () * Step 7: FlowAbstraction WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [A,B,0.0,0.1] eval ~> eval [A <= A, B <= A + B] eval ~> eval [A <= A + B, B <= B] start ~> eval [A <= A, B <= B] eval ~> exitus616 [A <= A, B <= B] + Loop: [0.0 <= K + A + B] eval ~> eval [A <= A + B, B <= B] + Loop: [0.1 <= A + B] eval ~> eval [A <= A, B <= A + B] + Applied Processor: FlowAbstraction + Details: () * Step 8: LareProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [tick,huge,K,A,B,0.0,0.1] eval ~> eval [A ~+> B,B ~+> B] eval ~> eval [A ~+> A,B ~+> A] start ~> eval [] eval ~> exitus616 [] + Loop: [A ~+> 0.0,B ~+> 0.0,K ~+> 0.0] eval ~> eval [A ~+> A,B ~+> A] + Loop: [A ~+> 0.1,B ~+> 0.1] eval ~> eval [A ~+> B,B ~+> B] + Applied Processor: LareProcessor + Details: start ~> exitus616 [A ~+> A ,A ~+> B ,A ~+> 0.0 ,A ~+> 0.1 ,A ~+> tick ,B ~+> A ,B ~+> B ,B ~+> 0.0 ,B ~+> 0.1 ,B ~+> tick ,tick ~+> tick ,K ~+> 0.0 ,K ~+> tick ,A ~*> A ,A ~*> B ,B ~*> A ,B ~*> B ,K ~*> A] + eval> [A ~+> A ,A ~+> 0.0 ,A ~+> tick ,B ~+> A ,B ~+> 0.0 ,B ~+> tick ,tick ~+> tick ,K ~+> 0.0 ,K ~+> tick ,A ~*> A ,B ~*> A ,K ~*> A] + eval> [A ~+> B ,A ~+> 0.1 ,A ~+> tick ,B ~+> B ,B ~+> 0.1 ,B ~+> tick ,tick ~+> tick ,A ~*> B ,B ~*> B] YES(?,O(n^1))