YES(?,O(1)) * Step 1: TrivialSCCs WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f3(A,B,C,D) -> f0(0,B,C,D) True (1,1) 1. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f0(1 + A,B,A,D) [A >= 0 && 9 >= A] (?,1) 2. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f4(A,E,C,D) [A >= 0 && A >= 10] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,4);(f3,4);(f4,4)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{}] + Applied Processor: TrivialSCCs + Details: All trivial SCCs of the transition graph admit timebound 1. * Step 2: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f3(A,B,C,D) -> f0(0,B,C,D) True (1,1) 1. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f0(1 + A,B,A,D) [A >= 0 && 9 >= A] (?,1) 2. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f4(A,E,C,D) [A >= 0 && A >= 10] (1,1) Signature: {(f0,4);(f3,4);(f4,4)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,2)] * Step 3: AddSinks WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f3(A,B,C,D) -> f0(0,B,C,D) True (1,1) 1. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f0(1 + A,B,A,D) [A >= 0 && 9 >= A] (?,1) 2. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f4(A,E,C,D) [A >= 0 && A >= 10] (1,1) Signature: {(f0,4);(f3,4);(f4,4)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2},2->{}] + Applied Processor: AddSinks + Details: () * Step 4: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f3(A,B,C,D) -> f0(0,B,C,D) True (1,1) 1. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f0(1 + A,B,A,D) [A >= 0 && 9 >= A] (?,1) 2. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f4(A,E,C,D) [A >= 0 && A >= 10] (?,1) 3. f0(A,B,C,D) -> exitus616(A,B,C,D) True (?,1) Signature: {(exitus616,4);(f0,4);(f3,4);(f4,4)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{1,2,3},2->{},3->{}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,2)] * Step 5: LooptreeTransformer WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f3(A,B,C,D) -> f0(0,B,C,D) True (1,1) 1. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f0(1 + A,B,A,D) [A >= 0 && 9 >= A] (?,1) 2. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f4(A,E,C,D) [A >= 0 && A >= 10] (?,1) 3. f0(A,B,C,D) -> exitus616(A,B,C,D) True (?,1) Signature: {(exitus616,4);(f0,4);(f3,4);(f4,4)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,3},1->{1,2,3},2->{},3->{}] + Applied Processor: LooptreeTransformer + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3] | `- p:[1] c: [1] * Step 6: SizeAbstraction WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: (Rules: 0. f3(A,B,C,D) -> f0(0,B,C,D) True (1,1) 1. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f0(1 + A,B,A,D) [A >= 0 && 9 >= A] (?,1) 2. f0(A,B,C,D) -> f4(A,E,C,D) [A >= 0 && A >= 10] (?,1) 3. f0(A,B,C,D) -> exitus616(A,B,C,D) True (?,1) Signature: {(exitus616,4);(f0,4);(f3,4);(f4,4)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,3},1->{1,2,3},2->{},3->{}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3] | `- p:[1] c: [1]) + Applied Processor: SizeAbstraction UseCFG Minimize + Details: () * Step 7: FlowAbstraction WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [A,B,C,D,0.0] f3 ~> f0 [A <= 0*K, B <= B, C <= C, D <= D] f0 ~> f0 [A <= 10*K, B <= B, C <= A, D <= D] f0 ~> f4 [A <= A, B <= unknown, C <= C, D <= D] f0 ~> exitus616 [A <= A, B <= B, C <= C, D <= D] + Loop: [0.0 <= 10*K + A] f0 ~> f0 [A <= 10*K, B <= B, C <= A, D <= D] + Applied Processor: FlowAbstraction + Details: () * Step 8: LareProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [tick,huge,K,A,B,C,D,0.0] f3 ~> f0 [K ~=> A] f0 ~> f0 [A ~=> C,K ~=> A] f0 ~> f4 [huge ~=> B] f0 ~> exitus616 [] + Loop: [A ~+> 0.0,K ~*> 0.0] f0 ~> f0 [A ~=> C,K ~=> A] + Applied Processor: LareProcessor + Details: f3 ~> exitus616 [K ~=> A,K ~=> C,tick ~+> tick,K ~+> 0.0,K ~+> tick,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] f3 ~> f4 [K ~=> A,K ~=> C,huge ~=> B,tick ~+> tick,K ~+> 0.0,K ~+> tick,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] + f0> [A ~=> C,K ~=> A,K ~=> C,A ~+> 0.0,A ~+> tick,tick ~+> tick,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] YES(?,O(1))