YES(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: UnsatRules WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 1. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [B >= 1 + A && A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 2. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [A >= 1 + B && B >= A] (?,1) 3. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True (1,1) Signature: {(eval,2);(start,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,1,2,3},1->{0,1,2,3},2->{0,1,2,3},3->{0,1,2,3},4->{0,1,2,3}] + Applied Processor: UnsatRules + Details: Following transitions have unsatisfiable constraints and are removed: [1,2] * Step 2: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True (1,1) Signature: {(eval,2);(start,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,3},3->{0,3},4->{0,3}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,3),(3,0)] * Step 3: FromIts WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 3. eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True (1,1) Signature: {(eval,2);(start,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{0},3->{3},4->{0,3}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 4: Unfold WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: eval(A,B) -> eval(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] eval(A,B) -> eval(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] start(A,B) -> eval(A,B) True Signature: {(eval,2);(start,2)} Rule Graph: [0->{0},3->{3},4->{0,3}] + Applied Processor: Unfold + Details: () * Step 5: AddSinks WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: eval.0(A,B) -> eval.0(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] eval.3(A,B) -> eval.3(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] start.4(A,B) -> eval.0(A,B) True start.4(A,B) -> eval.3(A,B) True Signature: {(eval.0,2);(eval.3,2);(start.4,2)} Rule Graph: [0->{0},1->{1},2->{0},3->{1}] + Applied Processor: AddSinks + Details: () * Step 6: Decompose WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: eval.0(A,B) -> eval.0(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] eval.3(A,B) -> eval.3(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] start.4(A,B) -> eval.0(A,B) True start.4(A,B) -> eval.3(A,B) True eval.3(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True eval.0(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True Signature: {(eval.0,2);(eval.3,2);(exitus616,2);(start.4,2)} Rule Graph: [0->{0,5},1->{1,4},2->{0},3->{1}] + Applied Processor: Decompose Greedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5] | +- p:[1] c: [1] | `- p:[0] c: [0] * Step 7: AbstractSize WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: (Rules: eval.0(A,B) -> eval.0(A,1 + B) [A >= 1 + B] eval.3(A,B) -> eval.3(1 + A,B) [B >= 1 + A && B >= A] start.4(A,B) -> eval.0(A,B) True start.4(A,B) -> eval.3(A,B) True eval.3(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True eval.0(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True Signature: {(eval.0,2);(eval.3,2);(exitus616,2);(start.4,2)} Rule Graph: [0->{0,5},1->{1,4},2->{0},3->{1}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5] | +- p:[1] c: [1] | `- p:[0] c: [0]) + Applied Processor: AbstractSize Minimize + Details: () * Step 8: AbstractFlow WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [A,B,0.0,0.1] eval.0 ~> eval.0 [A <= A, B <= A + B] eval.3 ~> eval.3 [A <= A + B, B <= B] start.4 ~> eval.0 [A <= A, B <= B] start.4 ~> eval.3 [A <= A, B <= B] eval.3 ~> exitus616 [A <= A, B <= B] eval.0 ~> exitus616 [A <= A, B <= B] + Loop: [0.0 <= A + B] eval.3 ~> eval.3 [A <= A + B, B <= B] + Loop: [0.1 <= K + A + B] eval.0 ~> eval.0 [A <= A, B <= A + B] + Applied Processor: AbstractFlow + Details: () * Step 9: Lare WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [tick,huge,K,A,B,0.0,0.1] eval.0 ~> eval.0 [A ~+> B,B ~+> B] eval.3 ~> eval.3 [A ~+> A,B ~+> A] start.4 ~> eval.0 [] start.4 ~> eval.3 [] eval.3 ~> exitus616 [] eval.0 ~> exitus616 [] + Loop: [A ~+> 0.0,B ~+> 0.0] eval.3 ~> eval.3 [A ~+> A,B ~+> A] + Loop: [A ~+> 0.1,B ~+> 0.1,K ~+> 0.1] eval.0 ~> eval.0 [A ~+> B,B ~+> B] + Applied Processor: Lare + Details: start.4 ~> exitus616 [A ~+> A ,A ~+> B ,A ~+> 0.0 ,A ~+> 0.1 ,A ~+> tick ,B ~+> A ,B ~+> B ,B ~+> 0.0 ,B ~+> 0.1 ,B ~+> tick ,tick ~+> tick ,K ~+> 0.1 ,K ~+> tick ,A ~*> A ,A ~*> B ,B ~*> A ,B ~*> B ,K ~*> B] + eval.3> [A ~+> A ,A ~+> 0.0 ,A ~+> tick ,B ~+> A ,B ~+> 0.0 ,B ~+> tick ,tick ~+> tick ,A ~*> A ,B ~*> A] + eval.0> [A ~+> B ,A ~+> 0.1 ,A ~+> tick ,B ~+> B ,B ~+> 0.1 ,B ~+> tick ,tick ~+> tick ,K ~+> 0.1 ,K ~+> tick ,A ~*> B ,B ~*> B ,K ~*> B] YES(?,O(n^1))