YES(?,O(1)) * Step 1: ArgumentFilter WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(-1 + A,B,C,D,E) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && A >= 101 && 9 >= B] (?,1) 1. f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && 100 >= A && 9 >= B] (?,1) 2. f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && B >= 10] (?,1) 3. f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(1000,B,C,D,E) True (1,1) Signature: {(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,1,2},1->{},2->{},3->{0,1,2}] + Applied Processor: ArgumentFilter [2,3,4] + Details: We remove following argument positions: [2,3,4]. * Step 2: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f300(A,B) -> f300(-1 + A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && A >= 101 && 9 >= B] (?,1) 1. f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && 100 >= A && 9 >= B] (?,1) 2. f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && B >= 10] (?,1) 3. f1(A,B) -> f300(1000,B) True (1,1) Signature: {(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,1,2},1->{},2->{},3->{0,1,2}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,2),(3,1)] * Step 3: FromIts WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f300(A,B) -> f300(-1 + A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && A >= 101 && 9 >= B] (?,1) 1. f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && 100 >= A && 9 >= B] (?,1) 2. f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && B >= 10] (?,1) 3. f1(A,B) -> f300(1000,B) True (1,1) Signature: {(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,1},1->{},2->{},3->{0,2}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 4: AddSinks WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: f300(A,B) -> f300(-1 + A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && A >= 101 && 9 >= B] f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && 100 >= A && 9 >= B] f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && B >= 10] f1(A,B) -> f300(1000,B) True Signature: {(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Rule Graph: [0->{0,1},1->{},2->{},3->{0,2}] + Applied Processor: AddSinks + Details: () * Step 5: Decompose WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: f300(A,B) -> f300(-1 + A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && A >= 101 && 9 >= B] f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && 100 >= A && 9 >= B] f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && B >= 10] f1(A,B) -> f300(1000,B) True f2(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True f2(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True Signature: {(exitus616,2);(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Rule Graph: [0->{0,1},1->{5},2->{4},3->{0,2}] + Applied Processor: Decompose Greedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5] | `- p:[0] c: [0] * Step 6: AbstractSize WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: (Rules: f300(A,B) -> f300(-1 + A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && A >= 101 && 9 >= B] f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && 100 >= A && 9 >= B] f300(A,B) -> f2(A,B) [1000 + -1*A >= 0 && B >= 10] f1(A,B) -> f300(1000,B) True f2(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True f2(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True Signature: {(exitus616,2);(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Rule Graph: [0->{0,1},1->{5},2->{4},3->{0,2}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5] | `- p:[0] c: [0]) + Applied Processor: AbstractSize Minimize + Details: () * Step 7: AbstractFlow WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [A,B,0.0] f300 ~> f300 [A <= 999*K, B <= B] f300 ~> f2 [A <= A, B <= B] f300 ~> f2 [A <= A, B <= B] f1 ~> f300 [A <= 1000*K, B <= B] f2 ~> exitus616 [A <= A, B <= B] f2 ~> exitus616 [A <= A, B <= B] + Loop: [0.0 <= 101*K + A] f300 ~> f300 [A <= 999*K, B <= B] + Applied Processor: AbstractFlow + Details: () * Step 8: Lare WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [tick,huge,K,A,B,0.0] f300 ~> f300 [K ~=> A] f300 ~> f2 [] f300 ~> f2 [] f1 ~> f300 [K ~=> A] f2 ~> exitus616 [] f2 ~> exitus616 [] + Loop: [A ~+> 0.0,K ~*> 0.0] f300 ~> f300 [K ~=> A] + Applied Processor: Lare + Details: f1 ~> exitus616 [K ~=> A,tick ~+> tick,K ~+> 0.0,K ~+> tick,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] + f300> [K ~=> A,A ~+> 0.0,A ~+> tick,tick ~+> tick,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] YES(?,O(1))