YES(?,O(n^1)) * Step 1: ArgumentFilter WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f1(A,B,C) -> f2(A,B,C) True (1,1) 1. f2(A,B,C) -> f300(A,B,D) [B >= 3 && A >= 2] (?,1) 2. f2(A,B,C) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B,C) [2 >= B && A >= 2] (?,1) 3. f2(A,B,C) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B,C) [1 >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f1,3);(f2,3);(f300,3)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{},2->{1,2,3},3->{1,2,3}] + Applied Processor: ArgumentFilter [2] + Details: We remove following argument positions: [2]. * Step 2: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f1(A,B) -> f2(A,B) True (1,1) 1. f2(A,B) -> f300(A,B) [B >= 3 && A >= 2] (?,1) 2. f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [2 >= B && A >= 2] (?,1) 3. f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [1 >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f1,3);(f2,3);(f300,3)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{},2->{1,2,3},3->{1,2,3}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(2,3)] * Step 3: FromIts WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f1(A,B) -> f2(A,B) True (1,1) 1. f2(A,B) -> f300(A,B) [B >= 3 && A >= 2] (?,1) 2. f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [2 >= B && A >= 2] (?,1) 3. f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [1 >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f1,3);(f2,3);(f300,3)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{},2->{1,2},3->{1,2,3}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 4: AddSinks WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: f1(A,B) -> f2(A,B) True f2(A,B) -> f300(A,B) [B >= 3 && A >= 2] f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [2 >= B && A >= 2] f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [1 >= A] Signature: {(f1,3);(f2,3);(f300,3)} Rule Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{},2->{1,2},3->{1,2,3}] + Applied Processor: AddSinks + Details: () * Step 5: Decompose WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: f1(A,B) -> f2(A,B) True f2(A,B) -> f300(A,B) [B >= 3 && A >= 2] f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [2 >= B && A >= 2] f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [1 >= A] f300(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True Signature: {(exitus616,2);(f1,3);(f2,3);(f300,3)} Rule Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{4},2->{1,2},3->{1,2,3}] + Applied Processor: Decompose Greedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4] | +- p:[3] c: [3] | `- p:[2] c: [2] * Step 6: AbstractSize WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: (Rules: f1(A,B) -> f2(A,B) True f2(A,B) -> f300(A,B) [B >= 3 && A >= 2] f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [2 >= B && A >= 2] f2(A,B) -> f2(1 + A,1 + B) [1 >= A] f300(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True Signature: {(exitus616,2);(f1,3);(f2,3);(f300,3)} Rule Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{4},2->{1,2},3->{1,2,3}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4] | +- p:[3] c: [3] | `- p:[2] c: [2]) + Applied Processor: AbstractSize Minimize + Details: () * Step 7: AbstractFlow WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [A,B,0.0,0.1] f1 ~> f2 [A <= A, B <= B] f2 ~> f300 [A <= A, B <= B] f2 ~> f2 [A <= K + A, B <= K + B] f2 ~> f2 [A <= K + A, B <= K + B] f300 ~> exitus616 [A <= A, B <= B] + Loop: [0.0 <= K + A] f2 ~> f2 [A <= K + A, B <= K + B] + Loop: [0.1 <= 2*K + B] f2 ~> f2 [A <= K + A, B <= K + B] + Applied Processor: AbstractFlow + Details: () * Step 8: Lare WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [tick,huge,K,A,B,0.0,0.1] f1 ~> f2 [] f2 ~> f300 [] f2 ~> f2 [A ~+> A,B ~+> B,K ~+> A,K ~+> B] f2 ~> f2 [A ~+> A,B ~+> B,K ~+> A,K ~+> B] f300 ~> exitus616 [] + Loop: [A ~+> 0.0,K ~+> 0.0] f2 ~> f2 [A ~+> A,B ~+> B,K ~+> A,K ~+> B] + Loop: [B ~+> 0.1,K ~*> 0.1] f2 ~> f2 [A ~+> A,B ~+> B,K ~+> A,K ~+> B] + Applied Processor: Lare + Details: f1 ~> exitus616 [A ~+> A ,A ~+> 0.0 ,A ~+> tick ,B ~+> B ,B ~+> 0.1 ,B ~+> tick ,tick ~+> tick ,K ~+> A ,K ~+> B ,K ~+> 0.0 ,K ~+> tick ,A ~*> A ,A ~*> B ,B ~*> A ,B ~*> B ,K ~*> A ,K ~*> B ,K ~*> 0.1 ,K ~*> tick] + f2> [A ~+> A ,A ~+> 0.0 ,A ~+> tick ,B ~+> B ,tick ~+> tick ,K ~+> A ,K ~+> B ,K ~+> 0.0 ,K ~+> tick ,A ~*> A ,A ~*> B ,K ~*> A ,K ~*> B] + f2> [A ~+> A ,B ~+> B ,B ~+> 0.1 ,B ~+> tick ,tick ~+> tick ,K ~+> A ,K ~+> B ,B ~*> A ,B ~*> B ,K ~*> A ,K ~*> B ,K ~*> 0.1 ,K ~*> tick] YES(?,O(n^1))