YES(?,O(1)) * Step 1: UnsatPaths WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B) -> f5(2,4) True (1,1) 1. f5(A,B) -> f5(2 + A,4 + A) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && 19 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A,B) -> f8(A,B) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && A >= 20] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,2);(f5,2);(f8,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,2)] * Step 2: FromIts WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B) -> f5(2,4) True (1,1) 1. f5(A,B) -> f5(2 + A,4 + A) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && 19 >= A] (?,1) 2. f5(A,B) -> f8(A,B) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && A >= 20] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,2);(f5,2);(f8,2)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2},2->{}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 3: AddSinks WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: f0(A,B) -> f5(2,4) True f5(A,B) -> f5(2 + A,4 + A) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && 19 >= A] f5(A,B) -> f8(A,B) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && A >= 20] Signature: {(f0,2);(f5,2);(f8,2)} Rule Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2},2->{}] + Applied Processor: AddSinks + Details: () * Step 4: Decompose WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Rules: f0(A,B) -> f5(2,4) True f5(A,B) -> f5(2 + A,4 + A) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && 19 >= A] f5(A,B) -> f8(A,B) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && A >= 20] f8(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True Signature: {(exitus616,2);(f0,2);(f5,2);(f8,2)} Rule Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2},2->{3}] + Applied Processor: Decompose Greedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3] | `- p:[1] c: [1] * Step 5: AbstractSize WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: (Rules: f0(A,B) -> f5(2,4) True f5(A,B) -> f5(2 + A,4 + A) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && 19 >= A] f5(A,B) -> f8(A,B) [2 + A + -1*B >= 0 && -4 + B >= 0 && -6 + A + B >= 0 && -2 + -1*A + B >= 0 && -2 + A >= 0 && A >= 20] f8(A,B) -> exitus616(A,B) True Signature: {(exitus616,2);(f0,2);(f5,2);(f8,2)} Rule Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2},2->{3}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3] | `- p:[1] c: [1]) + Applied Processor: AbstractSize Minimize + Details: () * Step 6: AbstractFlow WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [A,B,0.0] f0 ~> f5 [A <= 2*K, B <= 4*K] f5 ~> f5 [A <= 21*K, B <= 23*K] f5 ~> f8 [A <= A, B <= B] f8 ~> exitus616 [A <= A, B <= B] + Loop: [0.0 <= 19*K + A] f5 ~> f5 [A <= 21*K, B <= 23*K] + Applied Processor: AbstractFlow + Details: () * Step 7: Lare WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: Program: Domain: [tick,huge,K,A,B,0.0] f0 ~> f5 [K ~=> A,K ~=> B] f5 ~> f5 [K ~=> A,K ~=> B] f5 ~> f8 [] f8 ~> exitus616 [] + Loop: [A ~+> 0.0,K ~*> 0.0] f5 ~> f5 [K ~=> A,K ~=> B] + Applied Processor: Lare + Details: f0 ~> exitus616 [K ~=> A,K ~=> B,tick ~+> tick,K ~+> 0.0,K ~+> tick,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] + f5> [K ~=> A,K ~=> B,A ~+> 0.0,A ~+> tick,tick ~+> tick,K ~*> 0.0,K ~*> tick] YES(?,O(1))