YES * Step 1: FromIts YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B,C,D,E) -> f1(A,B,C,D,E) True (1,1) 1. f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f1(A,1 + B,C,D,E) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 2. f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,B,D,E) [B >= A] (?,1) 3. f2(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,-1 + C,D,E) [C >= 1] (?,1) 4. f2(A,B,C,D,E) -> f3(A,B,C,C,E) [0 >= C] (?,1) 5. f3(A,B,C,D,E) -> f3(A,B,C,1 + D,E) [A >= 1 + D] (?,1) 6. f3(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(A,B,C,D,D) [D >= A] (?,1) 7. f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(A,B,C,D,-1 + E) [E >= 1] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,5);(f1,5);(f2,5);(f3,5);(f4,5)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{3,4},3->{3,4},4->{5,6},5->{5,6},6->{7},7->{7}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 2: Decompose YES + Considered Problem: Rules: f0(A,B,C,D,E) -> f1(A,B,C,D,E) True f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f1(A,1 + B,C,D,E) [A >= 1 + B] f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,B,D,E) [B >= A] f2(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,-1 + C,D,E) [C >= 1] f2(A,B,C,D,E) -> f3(A,B,C,C,E) [0 >= C] f3(A,B,C,D,E) -> f3(A,B,C,1 + D,E) [A >= 1 + D] f3(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(A,B,C,D,D) [D >= A] f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(A,B,C,D,-1 + E) [E >= 1] Signature: {(f0,5);(f1,5);(f2,5);(f3,5);(f4,5)} Rule Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{3,4},3->{3,4},4->{5,6},5->{5,6},6->{7},7->{7}] + Applied Processor: Decompose NoGreedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7] | +- p:[1] c: [1] | +- p:[3] c: [3] | +- p:[5] c: [5] | `- p:[7] c: [7] * Step 3: CloseWith YES + Considered Problem: (Rules: f0(A,B,C,D,E) -> f1(A,B,C,D,E) True f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f1(A,1 + B,C,D,E) [A >= 1 + B] f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,B,D,E) [B >= A] f2(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,-1 + C,D,E) [C >= 1] f2(A,B,C,D,E) -> f3(A,B,C,C,E) [0 >= C] f3(A,B,C,D,E) -> f3(A,B,C,1 + D,E) [A >= 1 + D] f3(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(A,B,C,D,D) [D >= A] f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(A,B,C,D,-1 + E) [E >= 1] Signature: {(f0,5);(f1,5);(f2,5);(f3,5);(f4,5)} Rule Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{3,4},3->{3,4},4->{5,6},5->{5,6},6->{7},7->{7}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7] | +- p:[1] c: [1] | +- p:[3] c: [3] | +- p:[5] c: [5] | `- p:[7] c: [7]) + Applied Processor: CloseWith True + Details: () YES