YES * Step 1: UnsatPaths YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(-1 + A,B,C,D,E) [A >= 101 && 9 >= B] (?,1) 1. f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [100 >= A && 9 >= B] (?,1) 2. f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [B >= 10] (?,1) 3. f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(1000,B,C,D,E) True (1,1) Signature: {(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,1,2},1->{},2->{},3->{0,1,2}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,2),(3,1)] * Step 2: FromIts YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(-1 + A,B,C,D,E) [A >= 101 && 9 >= B] (?,1) 1. f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [100 >= A && 9 >= B] (?,1) 2. f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [B >= 10] (?,1) 3. f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(1000,B,C,D,E) True (1,1) Signature: {(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,1},1->{},2->{},3->{0,2}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 3: Decompose YES + Considered Problem: Rules: f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(-1 + A,B,C,D,E) [A >= 101 && 9 >= B] f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [100 >= A && 9 >= B] f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [B >= 10] f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(1000,B,C,D,E) True Signature: {(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Rule Graph: [0->{0,1},1->{},2->{},3->{0,2}] + Applied Processor: Decompose NoGreedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3] | `- p:[0] c: [0] * Step 4: CloseWith YES + Considered Problem: (Rules: f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(-1 + A,B,C,D,E) [A >= 101 && 9 >= B] f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [100 >= A && 9 >= B] f300(A,B,C,D,E) -> f2(A,B,0,0,0) [B >= 10] f1(A,B,C,D,E) -> f300(1000,B,C,D,E) True Signature: {(f1,5);(f2,5);(f300,5)} Rule Graph: [0->{0,1},1->{},2->{},3->{0,2}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3] | `- p:[0] c: [0]) + Applied Processor: CloseWith True + Details: () YES