YES * Step 1: UnsatPaths YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f1(A,B,C) -> f1(A,1 + B,C) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 1. f3(A,B,C) -> f1(A,B,C) [B >= 1 + C] (1,1) 2. f1(A,B,C) -> f1(A,B,1 + C) [B >= 2 + C && B >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f1,3);(f3,3)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,2},1->{0,2},2->{0,2}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(2,0)] * Step 2: FromIts YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f1(A,B,C) -> f1(A,1 + B,C) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 1. f3(A,B,C) -> f1(A,B,C) [B >= 1 + C] (1,1) 2. f1(A,B,C) -> f1(A,B,1 + C) [B >= 2 + C && B >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f1,3);(f3,3)} Flow Graph: [0->{0,2},1->{0,2},2->{2}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 3: Decompose YES + Considered Problem: Rules: f1(A,B,C) -> f1(A,1 + B,C) [A >= 1 + B] f3(A,B,C) -> f1(A,B,C) [B >= 1 + C] f1(A,B,C) -> f1(A,B,1 + C) [B >= 2 + C && B >= A] Signature: {(f1,3);(f3,3)} Rule Graph: [0->{0,2},1->{0,2},2->{2}] + Applied Processor: Decompose NoGreedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2] | +- p:[0] c: [0] | `- p:[2] c: [2] * Step 4: CloseWith YES + Considered Problem: (Rules: f1(A,B,C) -> f1(A,1 + B,C) [A >= 1 + B] f3(A,B,C) -> f1(A,B,C) [B >= 1 + C] f1(A,B,C) -> f1(A,B,1 + C) [B >= 2 + C && B >= A] Signature: {(f1,3);(f3,3)} Rule Graph: [0->{0,2},1->{0,2},2->{2}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2] | +- p:[0] c: [0] | `- p:[2] c: [2]) + Applied Processor: CloseWith True + Details: () YES