YES * Step 1: UnsatPaths YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(10,35,285,I,I,0,G,H) True (1,1) 1. f15(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,I,1) [A >= 1 + F] (?,1) 2. f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,I,1 + H) [E >= 1 + H] (?,1) 3. f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,E,1 + F,G,H) [E >= B] (?,1) 4. f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,1 + E,1 + F,G,H) [B >= 1 + E] (?,1) 5. f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [H >= E && I >= 1 + J] (?,1) 6. f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [H >= E] (?,1) 7. f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,-1 + E,1 + F,G,H) [H >= E] (?,1) 8. f15(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f48(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [F >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,8);(f15,8);(f25,8);(f41,8);(f48,8)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,8},1->{2,5,6,7},2->{2,5,6,7},3->{1,8},4->{1,8},5->{3,4},6->{3,4},7->{1,8},8->{}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,8)] * Step 2: FromIts YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(10,35,285,I,I,0,G,H) True (1,1) 1. f15(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,I,1) [A >= 1 + F] (?,1) 2. f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,I,1 + H) [E >= 1 + H] (?,1) 3. f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,E,1 + F,G,H) [E >= B] (?,1) 4. f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,1 + E,1 + F,G,H) [B >= 1 + E] (?,1) 5. f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [H >= E && I >= 1 + J] (?,1) 6. f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [H >= E] (?,1) 7. f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,-1 + E,1 + F,G,H) [H >= E] (?,1) 8. f15(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f48(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [F >= A] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,8);(f15,8);(f25,8);(f41,8);(f48,8)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{2,5,6,7},2->{2,5,6,7},3->{1,8},4->{1,8},5->{3,4},6->{3,4},7->{1,8},8->{}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 3: Decompose YES + Considered Problem: Rules: f0(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(10,35,285,I,I,0,G,H) True f15(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,I,1) [A >= 1 + F] f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,I,1 + H) [E >= 1 + H] f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,E,1 + F,G,H) [E >= B] f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,1 + E,1 + F,G,H) [B >= 1 + E] f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [H >= E && I >= 1 + J] f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [H >= E] f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,-1 + E,1 + F,G,H) [H >= E] f15(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f48(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [F >= A] Signature: {(f0,8);(f15,8);(f25,8);(f41,8);(f48,8)} Rule Graph: [0->{1},1->{2,5,6,7},2->{2,5,6,7},3->{1,8},4->{1,8},5->{3,4},6->{3,4},7->{1,8},8->{}] + Applied Processor: Decompose NoGreedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] | `- p:[1,3,5,2,6,4,7] c: [1,3,4,5,6,7] | `- p:[2] c: [2] * Step 4: CloseWith YES + Considered Problem: (Rules: f0(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(10,35,285,I,I,0,G,H) True f15(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,I,1) [A >= 1 + F] f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,I,1 + H) [E >= 1 + H] f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,E,1 + F,G,H) [E >= B] f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,1 + E,1 + F,G,H) [B >= 1 + E] f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [H >= E && I >= 1 + J] f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f41(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [H >= E] f25(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f15(A,B,C,D,-1 + E,1 + F,G,H) [H >= E] f15(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> f48(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [F >= A] Signature: {(f0,8);(f15,8);(f25,8);(f41,8);(f48,8)} Rule Graph: [0->{1},1->{2,5,6,7},2->{2,5,6,7},3->{1,8},4->{1,8},5->{3,4},6->{3,4},7->{1,8},8->{}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] | `- p:[1,3,5,2,6,4,7] c: [1,3,4,5,6,7] | `- p:[2] c: [2]) + Applied Processor: CloseWith True + Details: () YES