YES * Step 1: UnsatPaths YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(0,B,C,D,E) True (1,1) 1. f20(A,B,C,D,E) -> f20(A,1 + B,B,D,E) [199 >= B] (?,1) 2. f20(A,B,C,D,E) -> f31(A,B,C,D,E) [B >= 200] (?,1) 3. f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(1 + A,B,C,A,A) [99 >= A] (?,1) 4. f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f20(A,100,C,D,E) [A >= 100] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,5);(f20,5);(f31,5);(f4,5)} Flow Graph: [0->{3,4},1->{1,2},2->{},3->{3,4},4->{1,2}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,4),(4,2)] * Step 2: FromIts YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. f0(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(0,B,C,D,E) True (1,1) 1. f20(A,B,C,D,E) -> f20(A,1 + B,B,D,E) [199 >= B] (?,1) 2. f20(A,B,C,D,E) -> f31(A,B,C,D,E) [B >= 200] (?,1) 3. f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(1 + A,B,C,A,A) [99 >= A] (?,1) 4. f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f20(A,100,C,D,E) [A >= 100] (?,1) Signature: {(f0,5);(f20,5);(f31,5);(f4,5)} Flow Graph: [0->{3},1->{1,2},2->{},3->{3,4},4->{1}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 3: Decompose YES + Considered Problem: Rules: f0(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(0,B,C,D,E) True f20(A,B,C,D,E) -> f20(A,1 + B,B,D,E) [199 >= B] f20(A,B,C,D,E) -> f31(A,B,C,D,E) [B >= 200] f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(1 + A,B,C,A,A) [99 >= A] f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f20(A,100,C,D,E) [A >= 100] Signature: {(f0,5);(f20,5);(f31,5);(f4,5)} Rule Graph: [0->{3},1->{1,2},2->{},3->{3,4},4->{1}] + Applied Processor: Decompose NoGreedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4] | +- p:[3] c: [3] | `- p:[1] c: [1] * Step 4: CloseWith YES + Considered Problem: (Rules: f0(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(0,B,C,D,E) True f20(A,B,C,D,E) -> f20(A,1 + B,B,D,E) [199 >= B] f20(A,B,C,D,E) -> f31(A,B,C,D,E) [B >= 200] f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f4(1 + A,B,C,A,A) [99 >= A] f4(A,B,C,D,E) -> f20(A,100,C,D,E) [A >= 100] Signature: {(f0,5);(f20,5);(f31,5);(f4,5)} Rule Graph: [0->{3},1->{1,2},2->{},3->{3,4},4->{1}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4] | +- p:[3] c: [3] | `- p:[1] c: [1]) + Applied Processor: CloseWith True + Details: () YES