YES * Step 1: FromIts YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. start(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [A >= 101 && B = C && D = E && F = A && G = H] (?,1) 1. start(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [E >= 1 + C && B = C && D = E && F = A && G = H] (?,1) 2. start(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> lbl72(A,-1 + B,C,1 + F,E,D,F,H) [C >= E && 100 >= A && B = C && D = E && F = A && G = H] (?,1) 3. lbl72(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [F >= 101 (?,1) && 100 >= A && 101 + B + F >= A + C + E && 1 + B >= F && C >= 1 + B && C >= E && 1 + B + F + G = A + C + E && B + D + F = A + C + E] 4. lbl72(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [A + C + E >= 1 + 2*B + F (?,1) && 100 >= A && 101 + B + F >= A + C + E && 1 + B >= F && C >= 1 + B && C >= E && 1 + B + F + G = A + C + E && B + D + F = A + C + E] 5. lbl72(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> lbl72(A,-1 + B,C,1 + F,E,D,F,H) [2*B + F >= A + C + E (?,1) && 100 >= F && 100 >= A && 101 + B + F >= A + C + E && 1 + B >= F && C >= 1 + B && C >= E && 1 + B + F + G = A + C + E && B + D + F = A + C + E] 6. start0(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> start(A,C,C,E,E,A,H,H) True (1,1) Signature: {(lbl72,8);(start,8);(start0,8);(stop,8)} Flow Graph: [0->{},1->{},2->{3,4,5},3->{},4->{},5->{3,4,5},6->{0,1,2}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 2: Decompose YES + Considered Problem: Rules: start(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [A >= 101 && B = C && D = E && F = A && G = H] start(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [E >= 1 + C && B = C && D = E && F = A && G = H] start(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> lbl72(A,-1 + B,C,1 + F,E,D,F,H) [C >= E && 100 >= A && B = C && D = E && F = A && G = H] lbl72(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [F >= 101 && 100 >= A && 101 + B + F >= A + C + E && 1 + B >= F && C >= 1 + B && C >= E && 1 + B + F + G = A + C + E && B + D + F = A + C + E] lbl72(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [A + C + E >= 1 + 2*B + F && 100 >= A && 101 + B + F >= A + C + E && 1 + B >= F && C >= 1 + B && C >= E && 1 + B + F + G = A + C + E && B + D + F = A + C + E] lbl72(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> lbl72(A,-1 + B,C,1 + F,E,D,F,H) [2*B + F >= A + C + E && 100 >= F && 100 >= A && 101 + B + F >= A + C + E && 1 + B >= F && C >= 1 + B && C >= E && 1 + B + F + G = A + C + E && B + D + F = A + C + E] start0(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> start(A,C,C,E,E,A,H,H) True Signature: {(lbl72,8);(start,8);(start0,8);(stop,8)} Rule Graph: [0->{},1->{},2->{3,4,5},3->{},4->{},5->{3,4,5},6->{0,1,2}] + Applied Processor: Decompose NoGreedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5,6] | `- p:[5] c: [5] * Step 3: CloseWith YES + Considered Problem: (Rules: start(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [A >= 101 && B = C && D = E && F = A && G = H] start(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [E >= 1 + C && B = C && D = E && F = A && G = H] start(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> lbl72(A,-1 + B,C,1 + F,E,D,F,H) [C >= E && 100 >= A && B = C && D = E && F = A && G = H] lbl72(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [F >= 101 && 100 >= A && 101 + B + F >= A + C + E && 1 + B >= F && C >= 1 + B && C >= E && 1 + B + F + G = A + C + E && B + D + F = A + C + E] lbl72(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> stop(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) [A + C + E >= 1 + 2*B + F && 100 >= A && 101 + B + F >= A + C + E && 1 + B >= F && C >= 1 + B && C >= E && 1 + B + F + G = A + C + E && B + D + F = A + C + E] lbl72(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> lbl72(A,-1 + B,C,1 + F,E,D,F,H) [2*B + F >= A + C + E && 100 >= F && 100 >= A && 101 + B + F >= A + C + E && 1 + B >= F && C >= 1 + B && C >= E && 1 + B + F + G = A + C + E && B + D + F = A + C + E] start0(A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) -> start(A,C,C,E,E,A,H,H) True Signature: {(lbl72,8);(start,8);(start0,8);(stop,8)} Rule Graph: [0->{},1->{},2->{3,4,5},3->{},4->{},5->{3,4,5},6->{0,1,2}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4,5,6] | `- p:[5] c: [5]) + Applied Processor: CloseWith True + Details: () YES