YES * Step 1: FromIts YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval1(A,B,C) -> eval2(A,B,C) [A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 1. eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,1 + B,C) [-1 + A + -1*B >= 0 && A >= 1 + C] (?,1) 2. eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,1 + C) [-1 + A + -1*B >= 0 && A >= 1 + C] (?,1) 3. eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(-1 + A,B,C) [-1 + A + -1*B >= 0 && C >= A] (?,1) 4. start(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) True (1,1) Signature: {(eval1,3);(eval2,3);(start,3)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{0},2->{0},3->{0},4->{0}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 2: Decompose YES + Considered Problem: Rules: eval1(A,B,C) -> eval2(A,B,C) [A >= 1 + B] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,1 + B,C) [-1 + A + -1*B >= 0 && A >= 1 + C] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,1 + C) [-1 + A + -1*B >= 0 && A >= 1 + C] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(-1 + A,B,C) [-1 + A + -1*B >= 0 && C >= A] start(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) True Signature: {(eval1,3);(eval2,3);(start,3)} Rule Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{0},2->{0},3->{0},4->{0}] + Applied Processor: Decompose NoGreedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4] | `- p:[0,1,2,3] c: [3] | `- p:[0,1,2] c: [2] | `- p:[0,1] c: [0,1] * Step 3: CloseWith YES + Considered Problem: (Rules: eval1(A,B,C) -> eval2(A,B,C) [A >= 1 + B] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,1 + B,C) [-1 + A + -1*B >= 0 && A >= 1 + C] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,1 + C) [-1 + A + -1*B >= 0 && A >= 1 + C] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(-1 + A,B,C) [-1 + A + -1*B >= 0 && C >= A] start(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) True Signature: {(eval1,3);(eval2,3);(start,3)} Rule Graph: [0->{1,2,3},1->{0},2->{0},3->{0},4->{0}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3,4] | `- p:[0,1,2,3] c: [3] | `- p:[0,1,2] c: [2] | `- p:[0,1] c: [0,1]) + Applied Processor: CloseWith True + Details: () YES