YES * Step 1: UnsatPaths YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval1(A,B,C) -> eval2(A,B,C) [A >= 1 + B && C = A] (?,1) 1. eval2(A,B,C) -> eval2(-1 + A,B,-1 + C) [A + -1*C >= 0 && -1*A + C >= 0 && A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 2. eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) [A + -1*C >= 0 && -1*A + C >= 0 && B >= A] (?,1) 3. start(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) True (1,1) Signature: {(eval1,3);(eval2,3);(start,3)} Flow Graph: [0->{1,2},1->{1,2},2->{0},3->{0}] + Applied Processor: UnsatPaths + Details: We remove following edges from the transition graph: [(0,2),(2,0)] * Step 2: FromIts YES + Considered Problem: Rules: 0. eval1(A,B,C) -> eval2(A,B,C) [A >= 1 + B && C = A] (?,1) 1. eval2(A,B,C) -> eval2(-1 + A,B,-1 + C) [A + -1*C >= 0 && -1*A + C >= 0 && A >= 1 + B] (?,1) 2. eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) [A + -1*C >= 0 && -1*A + C >= 0 && B >= A] (?,1) 3. start(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) True (1,1) Signature: {(eval1,3);(eval2,3);(start,3)} Flow Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2},2->{},3->{0}] + Applied Processor: FromIts + Details: () * Step 3: Decompose YES + Considered Problem: Rules: eval1(A,B,C) -> eval2(A,B,C) [A >= 1 + B && C = A] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval2(-1 + A,B,-1 + C) [A + -1*C >= 0 && -1*A + C >= 0 && A >= 1 + B] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) [A + -1*C >= 0 && -1*A + C >= 0 && B >= A] start(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) True Signature: {(eval1,3);(eval2,3);(start,3)} Rule Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2},2->{},3->{0}] + Applied Processor: Decompose NoGreedy + Details: We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3] | `- p:[1] c: [1] * Step 4: CloseWith YES + Considered Problem: (Rules: eval1(A,B,C) -> eval2(A,B,C) [A >= 1 + B && C = A] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval2(-1 + A,B,-1 + C) [A + -1*C >= 0 && -1*A + C >= 0 && A >= 1 + B] eval2(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) [A + -1*C >= 0 && -1*A + C >= 0 && B >= A] start(A,B,C) -> eval1(A,B,C) True Signature: {(eval1,3);(eval2,3);(start,3)} Rule Graph: [0->{1},1->{1,2},2->{},3->{0}] ,We construct a looptree: P: [0,1,2,3] | `- p:[1] c: [1]) + Applied Processor: CloseWith True + Details: () YES