MAYBE
1017.64/297.02	MAYBE
1017.64/297.02	
1017.64/297.02	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
1017.64/297.02	certificate MAYBE.
1017.64/297.02	
1017.64/297.02	Strict Trs:
1017.64/297.02	  { a__U11(X1, X2) -> U11(X1, X2)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__U11(tt(), N) -> mark(N)
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(tt()) -> tt()
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X))
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(0()) -> 0()
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(plus(X1, X2)) -> a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(isNat(X)) -> a__isNat(X)
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(x(X1, X2)) -> a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2))
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(U11(X1, X2)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(U31(X)) -> a__U31(mark(X))
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) -> a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
1017.64/297.02	  , mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__U21(X1, X2, X3) -> U21(X1, X2, X3)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__U21(tt(), M, N) -> s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
1017.64/297.02	  , a__plus(X1, X2) -> plus(X1, X2)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__plus(N, s(M)) -> a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__plus(N, 0()) -> a__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__U31(X) -> U31(X)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__U31(tt()) -> 0()
1017.64/297.02	  , a__U41(X1, X2, X3) -> U41(X1, X2, X3)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__U41(tt(), M, N) -> a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
1017.64/297.02	  , a__x(X1, X2) -> x(X1, X2)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__x(N, s(M)) -> a__U41(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__x(N, 0()) -> a__U31(a__isNat(N))
1017.64/297.02	  , a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__and(tt(), X) -> mark(X)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__isNat(X) -> isNat(X)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__isNat(s(V1)) -> a__isNat(V1)
1017.64/297.02	  , a__isNat(0()) -> tt()
1017.64/297.02	  , a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
1017.64/297.02	  , a__isNat(x(V1, V2)) -> a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2)) }
1017.64/297.02	Obligation:
1017.64/297.02	  innermost runtime complexity
1017.64/297.02	Answer:
1017.64/297.02	  MAYBE
1017.64/297.02	
1017.64/297.02	None of the processors succeeded.
1017.64/297.02	
1017.64/297.02	Details of failed attempt(s):
1017.64/297.02	-----------------------------
1017.64/297.02	1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason:
1017.64/297.02	   
1017.64/297.02	   Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty.
1017.64/297.02	
1017.64/297.02	2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
1017.64/297.02	   
1017.64/297.02	   None of the processors succeeded.
1017.64/297.02	   
1017.64/297.02	   Details of failed attempt(s):
1017.64/297.02	   -----------------------------
1017.64/297.02	   1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
1017.64/297.02	      following reason:
1017.64/297.02	      
1017.64/297.02	      Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds.
1017.64/297.02	   
1017.64/297.02	   2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
1017.64/297.02	      
1017.64/297.02	      None of the processors succeeded.
1017.64/297.02	      
1017.64/297.02	      Details of failed attempt(s):
1017.64/297.02	      -----------------------------
1017.64/297.02	      1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297
1017.64/297.02	         seconds)' failed due to the following reason:
1017.64/297.02	         
1017.64/297.02	         Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds.
1017.64/297.02	      
1017.64/297.02	      2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
1017.64/297.02	         
1017.64/297.02	         None of the processors succeeded.
1017.64/297.02	         
1017.64/297.02	         Details of failed attempt(s):
1017.64/297.02	         -----------------------------
1017.64/297.02	         1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due
1017.64/297.02	            to the following reason:
1017.64/297.02	            
1017.64/297.02	            The input cannot be shown compatible
1017.64/297.02	         
1017.64/297.02	         2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
1017.64/297.02	            following reason:
1017.64/297.02	            
1017.64/297.02	            The input cannot be shown compatible
1017.64/297.02	         
1017.64/297.02	      
1017.64/297.02	      3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)'
1017.64/297.02	         failed due to the following reason:
1017.64/297.02	         
1017.64/297.02	         None of the processors succeeded.
1017.64/297.02	         
1017.64/297.02	         Details of failed attempt(s):
1017.64/297.02	         -----------------------------
1017.64/297.02	         1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
1017.64/297.02	            failed due to the following reason:
1017.64/297.02	            
1017.64/297.02	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
1017.64/297.02	         
1017.64/297.02	         2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
1017.64/297.02	            failed due to the following reason:
1017.64/297.02	            
1017.64/297.02	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
1017.64/297.02	         
1017.64/297.02	      
1017.64/297.02	   
1017.64/297.02	
1017.64/297.02	
1017.64/297.02	Arrrr..
1019.25/298.61	EOF