MAYBE
1062.10/297.04	MAYBE
1062.10/297.04	
1062.10/297.04	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
1062.10/297.04	certificate MAYBE.
1062.10/297.04	
1062.10/297.04	Strict Trs:
1062.10/297.04	  { active(filter(X1, X2, X3)) -> filter(X1, X2, active(X3))
1062.10/297.04	  , active(filter(X1, X2, X3)) -> filter(X1, active(X2), X3)
1062.10/297.04	  , active(filter(X1, X2, X3)) -> filter(active(X1), X2, X3)
1062.10/297.04	  , active(filter(cons(X, Y), 0(), M)) ->
1062.10/297.04	    mark(cons(0(), filter(Y, M, M)))
1062.10/297.04	  , active(filter(cons(X, Y), s(N), M)) ->
1062.10/297.04	    mark(cons(X, filter(Y, N, M)))
1062.10/297.04	  , active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2)
1062.10/297.04	  , active(s(X)) -> s(active(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , active(sieve(X)) -> sieve(active(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , active(sieve(cons(0(), Y))) -> mark(cons(0(), sieve(Y)))
1062.10/297.04	  , active(sieve(cons(s(N), Y))) ->
1062.10/297.04	    mark(cons(s(N), sieve(filter(Y, N, N))))
1062.10/297.04	  , active(nats(N)) -> mark(cons(N, nats(s(N))))
1062.10/297.04	  , active(nats(X)) -> nats(active(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , active(zprimes()) -> mark(sieve(nats(s(s(0())))))
1062.10/297.04	  , filter(X1, X2, mark(X3)) -> mark(filter(X1, X2, X3))
1062.10/297.04	  , filter(X1, mark(X2), X3) -> mark(filter(X1, X2, X3))
1062.10/297.04	  , filter(mark(X1), X2, X3) -> mark(filter(X1, X2, X3))
1062.10/297.04	  , filter(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(filter(X1, X2, X3))
1062.10/297.04	  , cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2))
1062.10/297.04	  , cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2))
1062.10/297.04	  , s(mark(X)) -> mark(s(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , s(ok(X)) -> ok(s(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , sieve(mark(X)) -> mark(sieve(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , sieve(ok(X)) -> ok(sieve(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , nats(mark(X)) -> mark(nats(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , nats(ok(X)) -> ok(nats(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , proper(filter(X1, X2, X3)) ->
1062.10/297.04	    filter(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
1062.10/297.04	  , proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
1062.10/297.04	  , proper(0()) -> ok(0())
1062.10/297.04	  , proper(s(X)) -> s(proper(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , proper(sieve(X)) -> sieve(proper(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , proper(nats(X)) -> nats(proper(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , proper(zprimes()) -> ok(zprimes())
1062.10/297.04	  , top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X))
1062.10/297.04	  , top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) }
1062.10/297.04	Obligation:
1062.10/297.04	  innermost runtime complexity
1062.10/297.04	Answer:
1062.10/297.04	  MAYBE
1062.10/297.04	
1062.10/297.04	None of the processors succeeded.
1062.10/297.04	
1062.10/297.04	Details of failed attempt(s):
1062.10/297.04	-----------------------------
1062.10/297.04	1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason:
1062.10/297.04	   
1062.10/297.04	   Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty.
1062.10/297.04	
1062.10/297.04	2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
1062.10/297.04	   
1062.10/297.04	   None of the processors succeeded.
1062.10/297.04	   
1062.10/297.04	   Details of failed attempt(s):
1062.10/297.04	   -----------------------------
1062.10/297.04	   1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
1062.10/297.04	      following reason:
1062.10/297.04	      
1062.10/297.04	      Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds.
1062.10/297.04	   
1062.10/297.04	   2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
1062.10/297.04	      
1062.10/297.04	      None of the processors succeeded.
1062.10/297.04	      
1062.10/297.04	      Details of failed attempt(s):
1062.10/297.04	      -----------------------------
1062.10/297.04	      1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297
1062.10/297.04	         seconds)' failed due to the following reason:
1062.10/297.04	         
1062.10/297.04	         Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds.
1062.10/297.04	      
1062.10/297.04	      2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
1062.10/297.04	         
1062.10/297.04	         None of the processors succeeded.
1062.10/297.04	         
1062.10/297.04	         Details of failed attempt(s):
1062.10/297.04	         -----------------------------
1062.10/297.04	         1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due
1062.10/297.04	            to the following reason:
1062.10/297.04	            
1062.10/297.04	            The input cannot be shown compatible
1062.10/297.04	         
1062.10/297.04	         2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
1062.10/297.04	            following reason:
1062.10/297.04	            
1062.10/297.04	            The input cannot be shown compatible
1062.10/297.04	         
1062.10/297.04	      
1062.10/297.04	      3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)'
1062.10/297.04	         failed due to the following reason:
1062.10/297.04	         
1062.10/297.04	         None of the processors succeeded.
1062.10/297.04	         
1062.10/297.04	         Details of failed attempt(s):
1062.10/297.04	         -----------------------------
1062.10/297.04	         1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
1062.10/297.04	            failed due to the following reason:
1062.10/297.04	            
1062.10/297.04	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
1062.10/297.04	         
1062.10/297.04	         2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
1062.10/297.04	            failed due to the following reason:
1062.10/297.04	            
1062.10/297.04	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
1062.10/297.04	         
1062.10/297.04	      
1062.10/297.04	   
1062.10/297.04	
1062.10/297.04	
1062.10/297.04	Arrrr..
1062.76/297.63	EOF