MAYBE
986.27/297.05	MAYBE
986.27/297.05	
986.27/297.05	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
986.27/297.05	certificate MAYBE.
986.27/297.05	
986.27/297.05	Strict Trs:
986.27/297.05	  { a__from(X) -> cons(mark(X), from(s(X)))
986.27/297.05	  , a__from(X) -> from(X)
986.27/297.05	  , mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2)
986.27/297.05	  , mark(from(X)) -> a__from(mark(X))
986.27/297.05	  , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X))
986.27/297.05	  , mark(0()) -> 0()
986.27/297.05	  , mark(nil()) -> nil()
986.27/297.05	  , mark(zWquot(X1, X2)) -> a__zWquot(mark(X1), mark(X2))
986.27/297.05	  , mark(sel(X1, X2)) -> a__sel(mark(X1), mark(X2))
986.27/297.05	  , mark(minus(X1, X2)) -> a__minus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
986.27/297.05	  , mark(quot(X1, X2)) -> a__quot(mark(X1), mark(X2))
986.27/297.05	  , a__sel(X1, X2) -> sel(X1, X2)
986.27/297.05	  , a__sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> a__sel(mark(N), mark(XS))
986.27/297.05	  , a__sel(0(), cons(X, XS)) -> mark(X)
986.27/297.05	  , a__minus(X1, X2) -> minus(X1, X2)
986.27/297.05	  , a__minus(X, 0()) -> 0()
986.27/297.05	  , a__minus(s(X), s(Y)) -> a__minus(mark(X), mark(Y))
986.27/297.05	  , a__quot(X1, X2) -> quot(X1, X2)
986.27/297.05	  , a__quot(s(X), s(Y)) ->
986.27/297.05	    s(a__quot(a__minus(mark(X), mark(Y)), s(mark(Y))))
986.27/297.05	  , a__quot(0(), s(Y)) -> 0()
986.27/297.05	  , a__zWquot(X1, X2) -> zWquot(X1, X2)
986.27/297.05	  , a__zWquot(XS, nil()) -> nil()
986.27/297.05	  , a__zWquot(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) ->
986.27/297.05	    cons(a__quot(mark(X), mark(Y)), zWquot(XS, YS))
986.27/297.05	  , a__zWquot(nil(), XS) -> nil() }
986.27/297.05	Obligation:
986.27/297.05	  innermost runtime complexity
986.27/297.05	Answer:
986.27/297.05	  MAYBE
986.27/297.05	
986.27/297.05	None of the processors succeeded.
986.27/297.05	
986.27/297.05	Details of failed attempt(s):
986.27/297.05	-----------------------------
986.27/297.05	1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason:
986.27/297.05	   
986.27/297.05	   Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty.
986.27/297.05	
986.27/297.05	2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
986.27/297.05	   
986.27/297.05	   None of the processors succeeded.
986.27/297.05	   
986.27/297.05	   Details of failed attempt(s):
986.27/297.05	   -----------------------------
986.27/297.05	   1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
986.27/297.05	      following reason:
986.27/297.05	      
986.27/297.05	      Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds.
986.27/297.05	   
986.27/297.05	   2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
986.27/297.05	      
986.27/297.05	      None of the processors succeeded.
986.27/297.05	      
986.27/297.05	      Details of failed attempt(s):
986.27/297.05	      -----------------------------
986.27/297.05	      1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297
986.27/297.05	         seconds)' failed due to the following reason:
986.27/297.05	         
986.27/297.05	         Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds.
986.27/297.05	      
986.27/297.05	      2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
986.27/297.05	         
986.27/297.05	         None of the processors succeeded.
986.27/297.05	         
986.27/297.05	         Details of failed attempt(s):
986.27/297.05	         -----------------------------
986.27/297.05	         1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due
986.27/297.05	            to the following reason:
986.27/297.05	            
986.27/297.05	            The input cannot be shown compatible
986.27/297.05	         
986.27/297.05	         2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
986.27/297.05	            following reason:
986.27/297.05	            
986.27/297.05	            The input cannot be shown compatible
986.27/297.05	         
986.27/297.05	      
986.27/297.05	      3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)'
986.27/297.05	         failed due to the following reason:
986.27/297.05	         
986.27/297.05	         None of the processors succeeded.
986.27/297.05	         
986.27/297.05	         Details of failed attempt(s):
986.27/297.05	         -----------------------------
986.27/297.05	         1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
986.27/297.05	            failed due to the following reason:
986.27/297.05	            
986.27/297.05	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
986.27/297.05	         
986.27/297.05	         2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
986.27/297.05	            failed due to the following reason:
986.27/297.05	            
986.27/297.05	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
986.27/297.05	         
986.27/297.05	      
986.27/297.05	   
986.27/297.05	
986.27/297.05	
986.27/297.05	Arrrr..
987.64/298.36	EOF