MAYBE 889.00/297.10 MAYBE 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 889.00/297.10 certificate MAYBE. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Strict Trs: 889.00/297.10 { active(f(X, g(X), Y)) -> mark(f(Y, Y, Y)) 889.00/297.10 , active(g(X)) -> g(active(X)) 889.00/297.10 , active(g(b())) -> mark(c()) 889.00/297.10 , active(b()) -> mark(c()) 889.00/297.10 , f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) -> ok(f(X1, X2, X3)) 889.00/297.10 , g(mark(X)) -> mark(g(X)) 889.00/297.10 , g(ok(X)) -> ok(g(X)) 889.00/297.10 , proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) -> f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3)) 889.00/297.10 , proper(g(X)) -> g(proper(X)) 889.00/297.10 , proper(b()) -> ok(b()) 889.00/297.10 , proper(c()) -> ok(c()) 889.00/297.10 , top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) 889.00/297.10 , top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) } 889.00/297.10 Obligation: 889.00/297.10 innermost runtime complexity 889.00/297.10 Answer: 889.00/297.10 MAYBE 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 None of the processors succeeded. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Details of failed attempt(s): 889.00/297.10 ----------------------------- 889.00/297.10 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 None of the processors succeeded. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Details of failed attempt(s): 889.00/297.10 ----------------------------- 889.00/297.10 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 889.00/297.10 following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 None of the processors succeeded. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Details of failed attempt(s): 889.00/297.10 ----------------------------- 889.00/297.10 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297 889.00/297.10 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 None of the processors succeeded. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Details of failed attempt(s): 889.00/297.10 ----------------------------- 889.00/297.10 1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due 889.00/297.10 to the following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 The input cannot be shown compatible 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 889.00/297.10 following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 The input cannot be shown compatible 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)' 889.00/297.10 failed due to the following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 None of the processors succeeded. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Details of failed attempt(s): 889.00/297.10 ----------------------------- 889.00/297.10 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 889.00/297.10 failed due to the following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 889.00/297.10 failed due to the following reason: 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 889.00/297.10 Arrrr.. 889.00/297.13 EOF