YES(?,O(n^1)) 0.00/0.20 YES(?,O(n^1)) 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 0.00/0.20 certificate YES(?,O(n^1)). 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 Strict Trs: 0.00/0.20 { f(X) -> n__f(X) 0.00/0.20 , f(f(a())) -> f(g(n__f(n__a()))) 0.00/0.20 , a() -> n__a() 0.00/0.20 , activate(X) -> X 0.00/0.20 , activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) 0.00/0.20 , activate(n__a()) -> a() } 0.00/0.20 Obligation: 0.00/0.20 innermost runtime complexity 0.00/0.20 Answer: 0.00/0.20 YES(?,O(n^1)) 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 Arguments of following rules are not normal-forms: 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 { f(f(a())) -> f(g(n__f(n__a()))) } 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 All above mentioned rules can be savely removed. 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 0.00/0.20 certificate YES(?,O(n^1)). 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 Strict Trs: 0.00/0.20 { f(X) -> n__f(X) 0.00/0.20 , a() -> n__a() 0.00/0.20 , activate(X) -> X 0.00/0.20 , activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) 0.00/0.20 , activate(n__a()) -> a() } 0.00/0.20 Obligation: 0.00/0.20 innermost runtime complexity 0.00/0.20 Answer: 0.00/0.20 YES(?,O(n^1)) 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 The input was oriented with the instance of 'Small Polynomial Path 0.00/0.20 Order (PS,1-bounded)' as induced by the safe mapping 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 safe(f) = {1}, safe(a) = {}, safe(n__f) = {1}, safe(n__a) = {}, 0.00/0.20 safe(activate) = {} 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 and precedence 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 activate > f, activate > a, f ~ a . 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 Following symbols are considered recursive: 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 {activate} 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 The recursion depth is 1. 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 For your convenience, here are the satisfied ordering constraints: 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 f(; X) > n__f(; X) 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 a() > n__a() 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 activate(X;) > X 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 activate(n__f(; X);) > f(; activate(X;)) 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 activate(n__a();) > a() 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 0.00/0.20 Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1)) 0.00/0.20 EOF