MAYBE
991.67/297.02	MAYBE
991.67/297.02	
991.67/297.02	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
991.67/297.02	certificate MAYBE.
991.67/297.02	
991.67/297.02	Strict Trs:
991.67/297.02	  { inc(s(x)) -> s(inc(x))
991.67/297.02	  , inc(0()) -> s(0())
991.67/297.02	  , plus(x, y) -> ifPlus(eq(x, 0()), minus(x, s(0())), x, inc(x))
991.67/297.02	  , ifPlus(false(), x, y, z) -> plus(x, z)
991.67/297.02	  , ifPlus(true(), x, y, z) -> y
991.67/297.02	  , eq(x, x) -> true()
991.67/297.02	  , eq(s(x), s(y)) -> eq(x, y)
991.67/297.02	  , eq(s(x), 0()) -> false()
991.67/297.02	  , eq(0(), s(x)) -> false()
991.67/297.02	  , eq(0(), 0()) -> true()
991.67/297.02	  , minus(x, x) -> 0()
991.67/297.02	  , minus(x, 0()) -> x
991.67/297.02	  , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y)
991.67/297.02	  , minus(0(), x) -> 0()
991.67/297.02	  , times(x, y) -> timesIter(x, y, 0())
991.67/297.02	  , timesIter(x, y, z) ->
991.67/297.02	    ifTimes(eq(x, 0()), minus(x, s(0())), y, z, plus(y, z))
991.67/297.02	  , ifTimes(false(), x, y, z, u) -> timesIter(x, y, u)
991.67/297.02	  , ifTimes(true(), x, y, z, u) -> z
991.67/297.02	  , f() -> g()
991.67/297.02	  , f() -> h() }
991.67/297.02	Obligation:
991.67/297.02	  innermost runtime complexity
991.67/297.02	Answer:
991.67/297.02	  MAYBE
991.67/297.02	
991.67/297.02	None of the processors succeeded.
991.67/297.02	
991.67/297.02	Details of failed attempt(s):
991.67/297.02	-----------------------------
991.67/297.02	1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason:
991.67/297.02	   
991.67/297.02	   Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty.
991.67/297.02	
991.67/297.02	2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
991.67/297.02	   
991.67/297.02	   None of the processors succeeded.
991.67/297.02	   
991.67/297.02	   Details of failed attempt(s):
991.67/297.02	   -----------------------------
991.67/297.02	   1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
991.67/297.02	      following reason:
991.67/297.02	      
991.67/297.02	      Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds.
991.67/297.02	   
991.67/297.02	   2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
991.67/297.02	      
991.67/297.02	      None of the processors succeeded.
991.67/297.02	      
991.67/297.02	      Details of failed attempt(s):
991.67/297.02	      -----------------------------
991.67/297.02	      1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297
991.67/297.02	         seconds)' failed due to the following reason:
991.67/297.02	         
991.67/297.02	         Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds.
991.67/297.02	      
991.67/297.02	      2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
991.67/297.02	         
991.67/297.02	         None of the processors succeeded.
991.67/297.02	         
991.67/297.02	         Details of failed attempt(s):
991.67/297.02	         -----------------------------
991.67/297.02	         1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due
991.67/297.02	            to the following reason:
991.67/297.02	            
991.67/297.02	            The input cannot be shown compatible
991.67/297.02	         
991.67/297.02	         2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
991.67/297.02	            following reason:
991.67/297.02	            
991.67/297.02	            The input cannot be shown compatible
991.67/297.02	         
991.67/297.02	      
991.67/297.02	      3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)'
991.67/297.02	         failed due to the following reason:
991.67/297.02	         
991.67/297.02	         None of the processors succeeded.
991.67/297.02	         
991.67/297.02	         Details of failed attempt(s):
991.67/297.02	         -----------------------------
991.67/297.02	         1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
991.67/297.02	            failed due to the following reason:
991.67/297.02	            
991.67/297.02	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
991.67/297.02	         
991.67/297.02	         2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
991.67/297.02	            failed due to the following reason:
991.67/297.02	            
991.67/297.02	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
991.67/297.02	         
991.67/297.02	      
991.67/297.02	   
991.67/297.02	
991.67/297.02	
991.67/297.02	Arrrr..
992.09/297.48	EOF