MAYBE 953.80/297.02 MAYBE 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 953.80/297.02 certificate MAYBE. 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Strict Trs: 953.80/297.02 { a__nats() -> cons(0(), incr(nats())) 953.80/297.02 , a__nats() -> nats() 953.80/297.02 , a__pairs() -> cons(0(), incr(odds())) 953.80/297.02 , a__pairs() -> pairs() 953.80/297.02 , a__odds() -> odds() 953.80/297.02 , a__odds() -> a__incr(a__pairs()) 953.80/297.02 , a__incr(X) -> incr(X) 953.80/297.02 , a__incr(cons(X, XS)) -> cons(s(mark(X)), incr(XS)) 953.80/297.02 , mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2) 953.80/297.02 , mark(0()) -> 0() 953.80/297.02 , mark(incr(X)) -> a__incr(mark(X)) 953.80/297.02 , mark(nats()) -> a__nats() 953.80/297.02 , mark(odds()) -> a__odds() 953.80/297.02 , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) 953.80/297.02 , mark(pairs()) -> a__pairs() 953.80/297.02 , mark(head(X)) -> a__head(mark(X)) 953.80/297.02 , mark(tail(X)) -> a__tail(mark(X)) 953.80/297.02 , mark(nil()) -> nil() 953.80/297.02 , a__head(X) -> head(X) 953.80/297.02 , a__head(cons(X, XS)) -> mark(X) 953.80/297.02 , a__tail(X) -> tail(X) 953.80/297.02 , a__tail(cons(X, XS)) -> mark(XS) } 953.80/297.02 Obligation: 953.80/297.02 innermost runtime complexity 953.80/297.02 Answer: 953.80/297.02 MAYBE 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 953.80/297.02 ----------------------------- 953.80/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 953.80/297.02 ----------------------------- 953.80/297.02 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 953.80/297.02 following reason: 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds. 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 953.80/297.02 ----------------------------- 953.80/297.02 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297 953.80/297.02 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds. 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 2) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)' 953.80/297.02 failed due to the following reason: 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Computation stopped due to timeout after 24.0 seconds. 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 3) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 953.80/297.02 ----------------------------- 953.80/297.02 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 953.80/297.02 following reason: 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 The input cannot be shown compatible 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due 953.80/297.02 to the following reason: 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 The input cannot be shown compatible 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 953.80/297.02 Arrrr.. 953.93/297.15 EOF