MAYBE 876.45/297.02 MAYBE 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 876.45/297.02 certificate MAYBE. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Strict Trs: 876.45/297.02 { nthtail(n, l) -> cond(ge(n, length(l)), n, l) 876.45/297.02 , cond(true(), n, l) -> l 876.45/297.02 , cond(false(), n, l) -> tail(nthtail(s(n), l)) 876.45/297.02 , ge(u, 0()) -> true() 876.45/297.02 , ge(s(u), s(v)) -> ge(u, v) 876.45/297.02 , ge(0(), s(v)) -> false() 876.45/297.02 , length(nil()) -> 0() 876.45/297.02 , length(cons(x, l)) -> s(length(l)) 876.45/297.02 , tail(nil()) -> nil() 876.45/297.02 , tail(cons(x, l)) -> l } 876.45/297.02 Obligation: 876.45/297.02 innermost runtime complexity 876.45/297.02 Answer: 876.45/297.02 MAYBE 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 876.45/297.02 ----------------------------- 876.45/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 876.45/297.02 ----------------------------- 876.45/297.02 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 876.45/297.02 following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 876.45/297.02 ----------------------------- 876.45/297.02 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297 876.45/297.02 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 876.45/297.02 ----------------------------- 876.45/297.02 1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due 876.45/297.02 to the following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 The input cannot be shown compatible 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 876.45/297.02 following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 The input cannot be shown compatible 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)' 876.45/297.02 failed due to the following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 876.45/297.02 ----------------------------- 876.45/297.02 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 876.45/297.02 failed due to the following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 876.45/297.02 failed due to the following reason: 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 876.45/297.02 Arrrr.. 876.67/297.22 EOF