MAYBE
953.97/297.02	MAYBE
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
953.97/297.02	certificate MAYBE.
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	Strict Trs:
953.97/297.02	  { min(x, 0()) -> 0()
953.97/297.02	  , min(0(), y) -> 0()
953.97/297.02	  , min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y))
953.97/297.02	  , max(x, 0()) -> x
953.97/297.02	  , max(0(), y) -> y
953.97/297.02	  , max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y))
953.97/297.02	  , minus(x, 0()) -> x
953.97/297.02	  , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> s(minus(x, y))
953.97/297.02	  , gcd(s(x), s(y)) ->
953.97/297.02	    gcd(minus(max(x, y), min(x, transform(y))), s(min(x, y)))
953.97/297.02	  , transform(x) -> s(s(x))
953.97/297.02	  , transform(s(x)) -> s(s(transform(x)))
953.97/297.02	  , transform(cons(x, y)) -> y
953.97/297.02	  , transform(cons(x, y)) -> cons(cons(x, x), x)
953.97/297.02	  , cons(x, y) -> y
953.97/297.02	  , cons(x, cons(y, s(z))) -> cons(y, x)
953.97/297.02	  , cons(cons(x, z), s(y)) -> transform(x) }
953.97/297.02	Obligation:
953.97/297.02	  innermost runtime complexity
953.97/297.02	Answer:
953.97/297.02	  MAYBE
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	Arguments of following rules are not normal-forms:
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	{ transform(cons(x, y)) -> y
953.97/297.02	, transform(cons(x, y)) -> cons(cons(x, x), x)
953.97/297.02	, cons(x, cons(y, s(z))) -> cons(y, x)
953.97/297.02	, cons(cons(x, z), s(y)) -> transform(x) }
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	All above mentioned rules can be savely removed.
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
953.97/297.02	certificate MAYBE.
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	Strict Trs:
953.97/297.02	  { min(x, 0()) -> 0()
953.97/297.02	  , min(0(), y) -> 0()
953.97/297.02	  , min(s(x), s(y)) -> s(min(x, y))
953.97/297.02	  , max(x, 0()) -> x
953.97/297.02	  , max(0(), y) -> y
953.97/297.02	  , max(s(x), s(y)) -> s(max(x, y))
953.97/297.02	  , minus(x, 0()) -> x
953.97/297.02	  , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> s(minus(x, y))
953.97/297.02	  , gcd(s(x), s(y)) ->
953.97/297.02	    gcd(minus(max(x, y), min(x, transform(y))), s(min(x, y)))
953.97/297.02	  , transform(x) -> s(s(x))
953.97/297.02	  , transform(s(x)) -> s(s(transform(x)))
953.97/297.02	  , cons(x, y) -> y }
953.97/297.02	Obligation:
953.97/297.02	  innermost runtime complexity
953.97/297.02	Answer:
953.97/297.02	  MAYBE
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	None of the processors succeeded.
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	Details of failed attempt(s):
953.97/297.02	-----------------------------
953.97/297.02	1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason:
953.97/297.02	   
953.97/297.02	   Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty.
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
953.97/297.02	   
953.97/297.02	   None of the processors succeeded.
953.97/297.02	   
953.97/297.02	   Details of failed attempt(s):
953.97/297.02	   -----------------------------
953.97/297.02	   1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
953.97/297.02	      following reason:
953.97/297.02	      
953.97/297.02	      Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds.
953.97/297.02	   
953.97/297.02	   2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
953.97/297.02	      
953.97/297.02	      None of the processors succeeded.
953.97/297.02	      
953.97/297.02	      Details of failed attempt(s):
953.97/297.02	      -----------------------------
953.97/297.02	      1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297
953.97/297.02	         seconds)' failed due to the following reason:
953.97/297.02	         
953.97/297.02	         Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds.
953.97/297.02	      
953.97/297.02	      2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
953.97/297.02	         
953.97/297.02	         None of the processors succeeded.
953.97/297.02	         
953.97/297.02	         Details of failed attempt(s):
953.97/297.02	         -----------------------------
953.97/297.02	         1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
953.97/297.02	            following reason:
953.97/297.02	            
953.97/297.02	            The input cannot be shown compatible
953.97/297.02	         
953.97/297.02	         2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due
953.97/297.02	            to the following reason:
953.97/297.02	            
953.97/297.02	            The input cannot be shown compatible
953.97/297.02	         
953.97/297.02	      
953.97/297.02	      3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)'
953.97/297.02	         failed due to the following reason:
953.97/297.02	         
953.97/297.02	         None of the processors succeeded.
953.97/297.02	         
953.97/297.02	         Details of failed attempt(s):
953.97/297.02	         -----------------------------
953.97/297.02	         1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
953.97/297.02	            failed due to the following reason:
953.97/297.02	            
953.97/297.02	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
953.97/297.02	         
953.97/297.02	         2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match''
953.97/297.02	            failed due to the following reason:
953.97/297.02	            
953.97/297.02	            match-boundness of the problem could not be verified.
953.97/297.02	         
953.97/297.02	      
953.97/297.02	   
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	
953.97/297.02	Arrrr..
954.19/297.26	EOF