MAYBE 899.35/297.02 MAYBE 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 899.35/297.02 certificate MAYBE. 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 Strict Trs: 899.35/297.02 { plus(0(), x) -> x 899.35/297.02 , plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(p(s(x)), y)) 899.35/297.02 , p(s(0())) -> 0() 899.35/297.02 , p(s(s(x))) -> s(p(s(x))) 899.35/297.02 , times(0(), y) -> 0() 899.35/297.02 , times(s(x), y) -> plus(y, times(p(s(x)), y)) 899.35/297.02 , fac(0(), x) -> x 899.35/297.02 , fac(s(x), y) -> fac(p(s(x)), times(s(x), y)) 899.35/297.02 , factorial(x) -> fac(x, s(0())) } 899.35/297.02 Obligation: 899.35/297.02 innermost runtime complexity 899.35/297.02 Answer: 899.35/297.02 MAYBE 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 899.35/297.02 ----------------------------- 899.35/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 899.35/297.02 ----------------------------- 899.35/297.02 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 899.35/297.02 following reason: 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds. 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 899.35/297.02 ----------------------------- 899.35/297.02 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297 899.35/297.02 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds. 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 899.35/297.02 ----------------------------- 899.35/297.02 1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due 899.35/297.02 to the following reason: 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 The input cannot be shown compatible 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 899.35/297.02 following reason: 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 The input cannot be shown compatible 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)' 899.35/297.02 failed due to the following reason: 899.35/297.02 899.35/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 899.35/297.03 899.35/297.03 Details of failed attempt(s): 899.35/297.03 ----------------------------- 899.35/297.03 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 899.35/297.03 failed due to the following reason: 899.35/297.03 899.35/297.03 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 899.35/297.03 899.35/297.03 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 899.35/297.03 failed due to the following reason: 899.35/297.03 899.35/297.03 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 899.35/297.03 899.35/297.03 899.35/297.03 899.35/297.03 899.35/297.03 899.35/297.03 Arrrr.. 899.60/297.28 EOF