YES(O(1), O(n^1)) 0.00/0.75 YES(O(1), O(n^1)) 0.00/0.76 0.00/0.76 0.00/0.76 0.00/0.76 0.00/0.76 0.00/0.76 Runtime Complexity (innermost) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml.xml 0.00/0.76 0.00/0.76 0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76 0.00/0.76 0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(0) → s(0) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → s(s(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → *(s(s(0)), f(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(x, s(0))) → +(s(s(0)), f(x)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(x, y)) → *(f(x), f(y))

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(1) CpxTrsToCdtProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Converted CpxTRS to CDT
0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(2) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

f(0) → s(0) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → s(s(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → *(s(s(0)), f(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(z0, s(0))) → +(s(s(0)), f(z0)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(z0, z1)) → *(f(z0), f(z1))
Tuples:

F(s(0)) → c2(F(0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1))
S tuples:

F(s(0)) → c2(F(0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

f

Defined Pair Symbols:

F

Compound Symbols:

c2, c3, c4

0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(3) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Removed 1 trailing tuple parts
0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(4) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

f(0) → s(0) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → s(s(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → *(s(s(0)), f(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(z0, s(0))) → +(s(s(0)), f(z0)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(z0, z1)) → *(f(z0), f(z1))
Tuples:

F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1)) 0.00/0.76
F(s(0)) → c2
S tuples:

F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1)) 0.00/0.76
F(s(0)) → c2
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

f

Defined Pair Symbols:

F

Compound Symbols:

c3, c4, c2

0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(5) CdtLeafRemovalProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Removed 1 trailing nodes:

F(s(0)) → c2
0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(6) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

f(0) → s(0) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → s(s(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → *(s(s(0)), f(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(z0, s(0))) → +(s(s(0)), f(z0)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(z0, z1)) → *(f(z0), f(z1))
Tuples:

F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1)) 0.00/0.76
F(s(0)) → c2
S tuples:

F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1)) 0.00/0.76
F(s(0)) → c2
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

f

Defined Pair Symbols:

F

Compound Symbols:

c3, c4, c2

0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(7) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^1))) transformation)

Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.

F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1))
We considered the (Usable) Rules:none
And the Tuples:

F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1)) 0.00/0.76
F(s(0)) → c2
The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation : 0.00/0.76

POL(+(x1, x2)) = [1] + x1 + x2    0.00/0.76
POL(0) = 0    0.00/0.76
POL(F(x1)) = [4]x1    0.00/0.76
POL(c2) = 0    0.00/0.76
POL(c3(x1)) = x1    0.00/0.76
POL(c4(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2    0.00/0.76
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(8) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

f(0) → s(0) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → s(s(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(s(0)) → *(s(s(0)), f(0)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(z0, s(0))) → +(s(s(0)), f(z0)) 0.00/0.76
f(+(z0, z1)) → *(f(z0), f(z1))
Tuples:

F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1)) 0.00/0.76
F(s(0)) → c2
S tuples:

F(s(0)) → c2
K tuples:

F(+(z0, s(0))) → c3(F(z0)) 0.00/0.76
F(+(z0, z1)) → c4(F(z0), F(z1))
Defined Rule Symbols:

f

Defined Pair Symbols:

F

Compound Symbols:

c3, c4, c2

0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(9) CdtKnowledgeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following tuples could be moved from S to K by knowledge propagation:

F(s(0)) → c2
Now S is empty
0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76

(10) BOUNDS(O(1), O(1))

0.00/0.76
0.00/0.76
0.00/0.78 EOF