MAYBE
923.72/297.03	MAYBE
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
923.72/297.03	certificate MAYBE.
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	Strict Trs:
923.72/297.03	  { a__zeros() -> cons(0(), zeros())
923.72/297.03	  , a__zeros() -> zeros()
923.72/297.03	  , a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2)
923.72/297.03	  , a__and(tt(), X) -> mark(X)
923.72/297.03	  , mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2)
923.72/297.03	  , mark(0()) -> 0()
923.72/297.03	  , mark(zeros()) -> a__zeros()
923.72/297.03	  , mark(tt()) -> tt()
923.72/297.03	  , mark(nil()) -> nil()
923.72/297.03	  , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X))
923.72/297.03	  , mark(take(X1, X2)) -> a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
923.72/297.03	  , mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2)
923.72/297.03	  , mark(length(X)) -> a__length(mark(X))
923.72/297.03	  , a__length(X) -> length(X)
923.72/297.03	  , a__length(cons(N, L)) -> s(a__length(mark(L)))
923.72/297.03	  , a__length(nil()) -> 0()
923.72/297.03	  , a__take(X1, X2) -> take(X1, X2)
923.72/297.03	  , a__take(0(), IL) -> nil()
923.72/297.03	  , a__take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> cons(mark(N), take(M, IL)) }
923.72/297.03	Obligation:
923.72/297.03	  runtime complexity
923.72/297.03	Answer:
923.72/297.03	  MAYBE
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	The input is overlay and right-linear. Switching to innermost
923.72/297.03	rewriting.
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
923.72/297.03	certificate MAYBE.
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	Strict Trs:
923.72/297.03	  { a__zeros() -> cons(0(), zeros())
923.72/297.03	  , a__zeros() -> zeros()
923.72/297.03	  , a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2)
923.72/297.03	  , a__and(tt(), X) -> mark(X)
923.72/297.03	  , mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2)
923.72/297.03	  , mark(0()) -> 0()
923.72/297.03	  , mark(zeros()) -> a__zeros()
923.72/297.03	  , mark(tt()) -> tt()
923.72/297.03	  , mark(nil()) -> nil()
923.72/297.03	  , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X))
923.72/297.03	  , mark(take(X1, X2)) -> a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2))
923.72/297.03	  , mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2)
923.72/297.03	  , mark(length(X)) -> a__length(mark(X))
923.72/297.03	  , a__length(X) -> length(X)
923.72/297.03	  , a__length(cons(N, L)) -> s(a__length(mark(L)))
923.72/297.03	  , a__length(nil()) -> 0()
923.72/297.03	  , a__take(X1, X2) -> take(X1, X2)
923.72/297.03	  , a__take(0(), IL) -> nil()
923.72/297.03	  , a__take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> cons(mark(N), take(M, IL)) }
923.72/297.03	Obligation:
923.72/297.03	  innermost runtime complexity
923.72/297.03	Answer:
923.72/297.03	  MAYBE
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	None of the processors succeeded.
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	Details of failed attempt(s):
923.72/297.03	-----------------------------
923.72/297.03	1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason:
923.72/297.03	   
923.72/297.03	   Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty.
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
923.72/297.03	   
923.72/297.03	   None of the processors succeeded.
923.72/297.03	   
923.72/297.03	   Details of failed attempt(s):
923.72/297.03	   -----------------------------
923.72/297.03	   1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
923.72/297.03	      following reason:
923.72/297.03	      
923.72/297.03	      Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds.
923.72/297.03	   
923.72/297.03	   2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
923.72/297.03	      
923.72/297.03	      None of the processors succeeded.
923.72/297.03	      
923.72/297.03	      Details of failed attempt(s):
923.72/297.03	      -----------------------------
923.72/297.03	      1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297
923.72/297.03	         seconds)' failed due to the following reason:
923.72/297.03	         
923.72/297.03	         Computation stopped due to timeout after 148.0 seconds.
923.72/297.03	      
923.72/297.03	      2) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)'
923.72/297.03	         failed due to the following reason:
923.72/297.03	         
923.72/297.03	         Computation stopped due to timeout after 24.0 seconds.
923.72/297.03	      
923.72/297.03	      3) 'Best' failed due to the following reason:
923.72/297.03	         
923.72/297.03	         None of the processors succeeded.
923.72/297.03	         
923.72/297.03	         Details of failed attempt(s):
923.72/297.03	         -----------------------------
923.72/297.03	         1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due
923.72/297.03	            to the following reason:
923.72/297.03	            
923.72/297.03	            The input cannot be shown compatible
923.72/297.03	         
923.72/297.03	         2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the
923.72/297.03	            following reason:
923.72/297.03	            
923.72/297.03	            The input cannot be shown compatible
923.72/297.03	         
923.72/297.03	      
923.72/297.03	   
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	
923.72/297.03	Arrrr..
924.06/297.36	EOF