MAYBE 839.75/297.04 MAYBE 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 839.75/297.04 certificate MAYBE. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Strict Trs: 839.75/297.04 { a__2nd(X) -> 2nd(X) 839.75/297.04 , a__2nd(cons1(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(Y) 839.75/297.04 , a__2nd(cons(X, X1)) -> a__2nd(cons1(mark(X), mark(X1))) 839.75/297.04 , mark(cons1(X1, X2)) -> cons1(mark(X1), mark(X2)) 839.75/297.04 , mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2) 839.75/297.04 , mark(from(X)) -> a__from(mark(X)) 839.75/297.04 , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) 839.75/297.04 , mark(2nd(X)) -> a__2nd(mark(X)) 839.75/297.04 , a__from(X) -> cons(mark(X), from(s(X))) 839.75/297.04 , a__from(X) -> from(X) } 839.75/297.04 Obligation: 839.75/297.04 runtime complexity 839.75/297.04 Answer: 839.75/297.04 MAYBE 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 839.75/297.04 following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297 839.75/297.04 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due 839.75/297.04 to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 The processor is inapplicable, reason: 839.75/297.04 Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 839.75/297.04 following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 The processor is inapplicable, reason: 839.75/297.04 Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)' 839.75/297.04 failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 839.75/297.04 ----------------------------- 839.75/297.04 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 839.75/297.04 failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 839.75/297.04 failed due to the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 3) 'Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to 839.75/297.04 the following reason: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 We add the following weak dependency pairs: 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Strict DPs: 839.75/297.04 { a__2nd^#(X) -> c_1(X) 839.75/297.04 , a__2nd^#(cons1(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> c_2(mark^#(Y)) 839.75/297.04 , a__2nd^#(cons(X, X1)) -> c_3(a__2nd^#(cons1(mark(X), mark(X1)))) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(cons1(X1, X2)) -> c_4(mark^#(X1), mark^#(X2)) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(cons(X1, X2)) -> c_5(mark^#(X1), X2) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(from(X)) -> c_6(a__from^#(mark(X))) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(s(X)) -> c_7(mark^#(X)) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(2nd(X)) -> c_8(a__2nd^#(mark(X))) 839.75/297.04 , a__from^#(X) -> c_9(mark^#(X), X) 839.75/297.04 , a__from^#(X) -> c_10(X) } 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 and mark the set of starting terms. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 839.75/297.04 certificate MAYBE. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Strict DPs: 839.75/297.04 { a__2nd^#(X) -> c_1(X) 839.75/297.04 , a__2nd^#(cons1(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> c_2(mark^#(Y)) 839.75/297.04 , a__2nd^#(cons(X, X1)) -> c_3(a__2nd^#(cons1(mark(X), mark(X1)))) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(cons1(X1, X2)) -> c_4(mark^#(X1), mark^#(X2)) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(cons(X1, X2)) -> c_5(mark^#(X1), X2) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(from(X)) -> c_6(a__from^#(mark(X))) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(s(X)) -> c_7(mark^#(X)) 839.75/297.04 , mark^#(2nd(X)) -> c_8(a__2nd^#(mark(X))) 839.75/297.04 , a__from^#(X) -> c_9(mark^#(X), X) 839.75/297.04 , a__from^#(X) -> c_10(X) } 839.75/297.04 Strict Trs: 839.75/297.04 { a__2nd(X) -> 2nd(X) 839.75/297.04 , a__2nd(cons1(X, cons(Y, Z))) -> mark(Y) 839.75/297.04 , a__2nd(cons(X, X1)) -> a__2nd(cons1(mark(X), mark(X1))) 839.75/297.04 , mark(cons1(X1, X2)) -> cons1(mark(X1), mark(X2)) 839.75/297.04 , mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2) 839.75/297.04 , mark(from(X)) -> a__from(mark(X)) 839.75/297.04 , mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) 839.75/297.04 , mark(2nd(X)) -> a__2nd(mark(X)) 839.75/297.04 , a__from(X) -> cons(mark(X), from(s(X))) 839.75/297.04 , a__from(X) -> from(X) } 839.75/297.04 Obligation: 839.75/297.04 runtime complexity 839.75/297.04 Answer: 839.75/297.04 MAYBE 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 839.75/297.04 Arrrr.. 840.40/297.65 EOF