YES(?,O(n^1))
19.91/5.93	YES(?,O(n^1))
19.91/5.93	
19.91/5.93	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
19.91/5.93	certificate YES(?,O(n^1)).
19.91/5.93	
19.91/5.93	Strict Trs:
19.91/5.93	  { f(nil()) -> nil()
19.91/5.93	  , f(.(nil(), y)) -> .(nil(), f(y))
19.91/5.93	  , f(.(.(x, y), z)) -> f(.(x, .(y, z)))
19.91/5.93	  , g(nil()) -> nil()
19.91/5.93	  , g(.(x, nil())) -> .(g(x), nil())
19.91/5.93	  , g(.(x, .(y, z))) -> g(.(.(x, y), z)) }
19.91/5.93	Obligation:
19.91/5.93	  runtime complexity
19.91/5.93	Answer:
19.91/5.93	  YES(?,O(n^1))
19.91/5.93	
19.91/5.93	The input is overlay and right-linear. Switching to innermost
19.91/5.93	rewriting.
19.91/5.93	
19.91/5.93	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
19.91/5.93	certificate YES(?,O(n^1)).
19.91/5.93	
19.91/5.93	Strict Trs:
19.91/5.93	  { f(nil()) -> nil()
19.91/5.93	  , f(.(nil(), y)) -> .(nil(), f(y))
19.91/5.93	  , f(.(.(x, y), z)) -> f(.(x, .(y, z)))
19.91/5.93	  , g(nil()) -> nil()
19.91/5.93	  , g(.(x, nil())) -> .(g(x), nil())
19.91/5.93	  , g(.(x, .(y, z))) -> g(.(.(x, y), z)) }
19.91/5.93	Obligation:
19.91/5.93	  innermost runtime complexity
19.91/5.93	Answer:
19.91/5.93	  YES(?,O(n^1))
19.91/5.93	
19.91/5.93	The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is
19.91/5.93	compatible with the following automaton.
19.91/5.93	{ f_0(2) -> 1
19.91/5.93	, f_0(3) -> 1
19.91/5.93	, f_1(2) -> 5
19.91/5.93	, f_1(3) -> 5
19.91/5.93	, f_1(6) -> 1
19.91/5.93	, f_1(6) -> 5
19.91/5.93	, f_1(7) -> 5
19.91/5.93	, nil_0() -> 2
19.91/5.93	, nil_1() -> 1
19.91/5.93	, nil_1() -> 4
19.91/5.93	, nil_1() -> 5
19.91/5.93	, nil_1() -> 8
19.91/5.93	, ._0(2, 2) -> 3
19.91/5.93	, ._0(2, 3) -> 3
19.91/5.93	, ._0(3, 2) -> 3
19.91/5.93	, ._0(3, 3) -> 3
19.91/5.93	, ._1(1, 5) -> 1
19.91/5.93	, ._1(2, 2) -> 7
19.91/5.93	, ._1(2, 3) -> 7
19.91/5.93	, ._1(2, 6) -> 6
19.91/5.93	, ._1(2, 7) -> 6
19.91/5.93	, ._1(3, 2) -> 7
19.91/5.93	, ._1(3, 3) -> 7
19.91/5.93	, ._1(3, 6) -> 6
19.91/5.93	, ._1(3, 7) -> 6
19.91/5.93	, ._1(5, 5) -> 5
19.91/5.93	, ._1(7, 2) -> 9
19.91/5.93	, ._1(7, 3) -> 9
19.91/5.93	, ._1(8, 4) -> 4
19.91/5.93	, ._1(8, 8) -> 8
19.91/5.93	, ._1(9, 2) -> 9
19.91/5.93	, ._1(9, 3) -> 9
19.91/5.93	, g_0(2) -> 4
19.91/5.93	, g_0(3) -> 4
19.91/5.93	, g_1(2) -> 8
19.91/5.93	, g_1(3) -> 8
19.91/5.93	, g_1(7) -> 8
19.91/5.93	, g_1(9) -> 4
19.91/5.93	, g_1(9) -> 8 }
19.91/5.93	
19.91/5.93	Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))
19.91/5.94	EOF