MAYBE 341.33/192.32 MAYBE 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 341.33/192.32 certificate MAYBE. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Strict Trs: 341.33/192.32 { minus(x, 0()) -> x 341.33/192.32 , minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z)) 341.33/192.32 , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y) 341.33/192.32 , quot(0(), s(y)) -> 0() 341.33/192.32 , quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y))) 341.33/192.32 , plus(0(), y) -> y 341.33/192.32 , plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y)) } 341.33/192.32 Obligation: 341.33/192.32 runtime complexity 341.33/192.32 Answer: 341.33/192.32 MAYBE 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297 341.33/192.32 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 2) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.32 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.32 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 341.33/192.32 following reason: 341.33/192.32 341.33/192.32 The processor is inapplicable, reason: 341.33/192.33 Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due 341.33/192.33 to the following reason: 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 The processor is inapplicable, reason: 341.33/192.33 Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)' 341.33/192.33 failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 None of the processors succeeded. 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 Details of failed attempt(s): 341.33/192.33 ----------------------------- 341.33/192.33 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 341.33/192.33 failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 341.33/192.33 failed due to the following reason: 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 2) 'Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to 341.33/192.33 the following reason: 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 We add the following weak dependency pairs: 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 Strict DPs: 341.33/192.33 { minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_1(x) 341.33/192.33 , minus^#(minus(x, y), z) -> c_2(minus^#(x, plus(y, z))) 341.33/192.33 , minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(minus^#(x, y)) 341.33/192.33 , quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_4() 341.33/192.33 , quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y))) 341.33/192.33 , plus^#(0(), y) -> c_6(y) 341.33/192.33 , plus^#(s(x), y) -> c_7(plus^#(x, y)) } 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 and mark the set of starting terms. 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 341.33/192.33 certificate MAYBE. 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 Strict DPs: 341.33/192.33 { minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_1(x) 341.33/192.33 , minus^#(minus(x, y), z) -> c_2(minus^#(x, plus(y, z))) 341.33/192.33 , minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(minus^#(x, y)) 341.33/192.33 , quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_4() 341.33/192.33 , quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y))) 341.33/192.33 , plus^#(0(), y) -> c_6(y) 341.33/192.33 , plus^#(s(x), y) -> c_7(plus^#(x, y)) } 341.33/192.33 Strict Trs: 341.33/192.33 { minus(x, 0()) -> x 341.33/192.33 , minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z)) 341.33/192.33 , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y) 341.33/192.33 , quot(0(), s(y)) -> 0() 341.33/192.33 , quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y))) 341.33/192.33 , plus(0(), y) -> y 341.33/192.33 , plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y)) } 341.33/192.33 Obligation: 341.33/192.33 runtime complexity 341.33/192.33 Answer: 341.33/192.33 MAYBE 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 We estimate the number of application of {4} by applications of 341.33/192.33 Pre({4}) = {1,5,6}. Here rules are labeled as follows: 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 DPs: 341.33/192.33 { 1: minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_1(x) 341.33/192.33 , 2: minus^#(minus(x, y), z) -> c_2(minus^#(x, plus(y, z))) 341.33/192.33 , 3: minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(minus^#(x, y)) 341.33/192.33 , 4: quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_4() 341.33/192.33 , 5: quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y))) 341.33/192.33 , 6: plus^#(0(), y) -> c_6(y) 341.33/192.33 , 7: plus^#(s(x), y) -> c_7(plus^#(x, y)) } 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 341.33/192.33 certificate MAYBE. 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 Strict DPs: 341.33/192.33 { minus^#(x, 0()) -> c_1(x) 341.33/192.33 , minus^#(minus(x, y), z) -> c_2(minus^#(x, plus(y, z))) 341.33/192.33 , minus^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_3(minus^#(x, y)) 341.33/192.33 , quot^#(s(x), s(y)) -> c_5(quot^#(minus(x, y), s(y))) 341.33/192.33 , plus^#(0(), y) -> c_6(y) 341.33/192.33 , plus^#(s(x), y) -> c_7(plus^#(x, y)) } 341.33/192.33 Strict Trs: 341.33/192.33 { minus(x, 0()) -> x 341.33/192.33 , minus(minus(x, y), z) -> minus(x, plus(y, z)) 341.33/192.33 , minus(s(x), s(y)) -> minus(x, y) 341.33/192.33 , quot(0(), s(y)) -> 0() 341.33/192.33 , quot(s(x), s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y))) 341.33/192.33 , plus(0(), y) -> y 341.33/192.33 , plus(s(x), y) -> s(plus(x, y)) } 341.33/192.33 Weak DPs: { quot^#(0(), s(y)) -> c_4() } 341.33/192.33 Obligation: 341.33/192.33 runtime complexity 341.33/192.33 Answer: 341.33/192.33 MAYBE 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 341.33/192.33 Arrrr.. 341.55/192.55 EOF