MAYBE 830.07/297.02 MAYBE 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 830.07/297.02 certificate MAYBE. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Strict Trs: 830.07/297.02 { f(x) -> s(x) 830.07/297.02 , f(s(s(x))) -> s(f(f(x))) } 830.07/297.02 Obligation: 830.07/297.02 runtime complexity 830.07/297.02 Answer: 830.07/297.02 MAYBE 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 The input is overlay and right-linear. Switching to innermost 830.07/297.02 rewriting. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 830.07/297.02 certificate MAYBE. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Strict Trs: 830.07/297.02 { f(x) -> s(x) 830.07/297.02 , f(s(s(x))) -> s(f(f(x))) } 830.07/297.02 Obligation: 830.07/297.02 innermost runtime complexity 830.07/297.02 Answer: 830.07/297.02 MAYBE 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 830.07/297.02 following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)' 830.07/297.02 failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Computation stopped due to timeout after 24.0 seconds. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297 830.07/297.02 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 The weightgap principle applies (using the following nonconstant 830.07/297.02 growth matrix-interpretation) 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 TcT has computed the following matrix interpretation satisfying 830.07/297.02 not(EDA) and not(IDA(1)). 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 [f](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 [s](x1) = [1] x1 + [4] 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 The order satisfies the following ordering constraints: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 [f(x)] = [1] x + [0] 830.07/297.02 ? [1] x + [4] 830.07/297.02 = [s(x)] 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 [f(s(s(x)))] = [1] x + [8] 830.07/297.02 > [1] x + [4] 830.07/297.02 = [s(f(f(x)))] 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 830.07/297.02 certificate MAYBE. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Strict Trs: { f(x) -> s(x) } 830.07/297.02 Weak Trs: { f(s(s(x))) -> s(f(f(x))) } 830.07/297.02 Obligation: 830.07/297.02 innermost runtime complexity 830.07/297.02 Answer: 830.07/297.02 MAYBE 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 3) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 None of the processors succeeded. 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Details of failed attempt(s): 830.07/297.02 ----------------------------- 830.07/297.02 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 830.07/297.02 following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 The input cannot be shown compatible 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due 830.07/297.02 to the following reason: 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 The input cannot be shown compatible 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 830.07/297.02 Arrrr.. 830.28/297.25 EOF