MAYBE 498.11/178.77 MAYBE 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 498.11/178.77 certificate MAYBE. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Strict Trs: 498.11/178.77 { a(b(x1)) -> x1 498.11/178.77 , a(c(x1)) -> b(c(c(b(a(a(x1)))))) 498.11/178.77 , b(c(x1)) -> x1 } 498.11/178.77 Obligation: 498.11/178.77 derivational complexity 498.11/178.77 Answer: 498.11/178.77 MAYBE 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 None of the processors succeeded. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Details of failed attempt(s): 498.11/178.77 ----------------------------- 498.11/178.77 1) 'Inspecting Problem... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to 498.11/178.77 the following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The weightgap principle applies (using the following nonconstant 498.11/178.77 growth matrix-interpretation) 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 TcT has computed the following triangular matrix interpretation. 498.11/178.77 Note that the diagonal of the component-wise maxima of 498.11/178.77 interpretation-entries contains no more than 1 non-zero entries. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [a](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [b](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [c](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The order satisfies the following ordering constraints: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [a(b(x1))] = [1] x1 + [1] 498.11/178.77 > [1] x1 + [0] 498.11/178.77 = [x1] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [a(c(x1))] = [1] x1 + [1] 498.11/178.77 ? [1] x1 + [2] 498.11/178.77 = [b(c(c(b(a(a(x1))))))] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [b(c(x1))] = [1] x1 + [0] 498.11/178.77 >= [1] x1 + [0] 498.11/178.77 = [x1] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 498.11/178.77 certificate MAYBE. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Strict Trs: 498.11/178.77 { a(c(x1)) -> b(c(c(b(a(a(x1)))))) 498.11/178.77 , b(c(x1)) -> x1 } 498.11/178.77 Weak Trs: { a(b(x1)) -> x1 } 498.11/178.77 Obligation: 498.11/178.77 derivational complexity 498.11/178.77 Answer: 498.11/178.77 MAYBE 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The weightgap principle applies (using the following nonconstant 498.11/178.77 growth matrix-interpretation) 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 TcT has computed the following triangular matrix interpretation. 498.11/178.77 Note that the diagonal of the component-wise maxima of 498.11/178.77 interpretation-entries contains no more than 1 non-zero entries. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [a](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [b](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [c](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The order satisfies the following ordering constraints: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [a(b(x1))] = [1] x1 + [2] 498.11/178.77 > [1] x1 + [0] 498.11/178.77 = [x1] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [a(c(x1))] = [1] x1 + [1] 498.11/178.77 ? [1] x1 + [4] 498.11/178.77 = [b(c(c(b(a(a(x1))))))] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 [b(c(x1))] = [1] x1 + [1] 498.11/178.77 > [1] x1 + [0] 498.11/178.77 = [x1] 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 498.11/178.77 certificate MAYBE. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Strict Trs: { a(c(x1)) -> b(c(c(b(a(a(x1)))))) } 498.11/178.77 Weak Trs: 498.11/178.77 { a(b(x1)) -> x1 498.11/178.77 , b(c(x1)) -> x1 } 498.11/178.77 Obligation: 498.11/178.77 derivational complexity 498.11/178.77 Answer: 498.11/178.77 MAYBE 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 None of the processors succeeded. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Details of failed attempt(s): 498.11/178.77 ----------------------------- 498.11/178.77 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 2) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 None of the processors succeeded. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Details of failed attempt(s): 498.11/178.77 ----------------------------- 498.11/178.77 1) 'bsearch-matrix' failed due to the following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The input cannot be shown compatible 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 2) 'iteProgress' failed due to the following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Fail 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 3) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 None of the processors succeeded. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Details of failed attempt(s): 498.11/178.77 ----------------------------- 498.11/178.77 1) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 6' failed due to the 498.11/178.77 following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The input cannot be shown compatible 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 2) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 5' failed due to the 498.11/178.77 following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The input cannot be shown compatible 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 3) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 4' failed due to the 498.11/178.77 following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The input cannot be shown compatible 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 4) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 3' failed due to the 498.11/178.77 following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The input cannot be shown compatible 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 5) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 2' failed due to the 498.11/178.77 following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The input cannot be shown compatible 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 6) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 1' failed due to the 498.11/178.77 following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The input cannot be shown compatible 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 4) 'Fastest (timeout of 30 seconds)' failed due to the following 498.11/178.77 reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 2) 'bsearch-matrix (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 498.11/178.77 following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 The input cannot be shown compatible 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 3) 'iteProgress (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 498.11/178.77 following reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Fail 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 4) 'Fastest (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following 498.11/178.77 reason: 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 498.11/178.77 Arrrr.. 498.42/178.83 EOF