MAYBE 197.26/75.26 MAYBE 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 197.26/75.26 certificate MAYBE. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Strict Trs: 197.26/75.26 { a(x1) -> b(c(x1)) 197.26/75.26 , b(a(b(x1))) -> c(x1) 197.26/75.26 , c(c(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) } 197.26/75.26 Obligation: 197.26/75.26 derivational complexity 197.26/75.26 Answer: 197.26/75.26 MAYBE 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 None of the processors succeeded. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Details of failed attempt(s): 197.26/75.26 ----------------------------- 197.26/75.26 1) 'Inspecting Problem... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to 197.26/75.26 the following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The weightgap principle applies (using the following nonconstant 197.26/75.26 growth matrix-interpretation) 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 TcT has computed the following triangular matrix interpretation. 197.26/75.26 Note that the diagonal of the component-wise maxima of 197.26/75.26 interpretation-entries contains no more than 1 non-zero entries. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 [a](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 [b](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 [c](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The order satisfies the following ordering constraints: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 [a(x1)] = [1] x1 + [1] 197.26/75.26 > [1] x1 + [0] 197.26/75.26 = [b(c(x1))] 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 [b(a(b(x1)))] = [1] x1 + [1] 197.26/75.26 > [1] x1 + [0] 197.26/75.26 = [c(x1)] 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 [c(c(x1))] = [1] x1 + [0] 197.26/75.26 ? [1] x1 + [2] 197.26/75.26 = [a(a(b(x1)))] 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 197.26/75.26 certificate MAYBE. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Strict Trs: { c(c(x1)) -> a(a(b(x1))) } 197.26/75.26 Weak Trs: 197.26/75.26 { a(x1) -> b(c(x1)) 197.26/75.26 , b(a(b(x1))) -> c(x1) } 197.26/75.26 Obligation: 197.26/75.26 derivational complexity 197.26/75.26 Answer: 197.26/75.26 MAYBE 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 None of the processors succeeded. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Details of failed attempt(s): 197.26/75.26 ----------------------------- 197.26/75.26 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 2) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 None of the processors succeeded. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Details of failed attempt(s): 197.26/75.26 ----------------------------- 197.26/75.26 1) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 None of the processors succeeded. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Details of failed attempt(s): 197.26/75.26 ----------------------------- 197.26/75.26 1) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 6' failed due to the 197.26/75.26 following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The input cannot be shown compatible 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 2) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 5' failed due to the 197.26/75.26 following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The input cannot be shown compatible 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 3) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 4' failed due to the 197.26/75.26 following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The input cannot be shown compatible 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 4) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 3' failed due to the 197.26/75.26 following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The input cannot be shown compatible 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 5) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 2' failed due to the 197.26/75.26 following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The input cannot be shown compatible 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 6) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 1' failed due to the 197.26/75.26 following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The input cannot be shown compatible 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 2) 'Fastest (timeout of 30 seconds)' failed due to the following 197.26/75.26 reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 3) 'iteProgress' failed due to the following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Fail 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 4) 'bsearch-matrix' failed due to the following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The input cannot be shown compatible 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 2) 'Fastest (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following 197.26/75.26 reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 None of the processors succeeded. 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 3) 'iteProgress (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 197.26/75.26 following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Fail 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 4) 'bsearch-matrix (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 197.26/75.26 following reason: 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 The input cannot be shown compatible 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 197.26/75.26 Arrrr.. 197.26/75.28 EOF