MAYBE 416.53/142.14 MAYBE 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 416.53/142.14 certificate MAYBE. 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 Strict Trs: 416.53/142.14 { a(x1) -> x1 416.53/142.14 , a(b(x1)) -> b(b(c(a(c(a(x1)))))) 416.53/142.14 , b(x1) -> x1 416.53/142.14 , c(c(x1)) -> x1 } 416.53/142.14 Obligation: 416.53/142.14 derivational complexity 416.53/142.14 Answer: 416.53/142.14 MAYBE 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 None of the processors succeeded. 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 Details of failed attempt(s): 416.53/142.14 ----------------------------- 416.53/142.14 1) 'Inspecting Problem... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to 416.53/142.14 the following reason: 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 The weightgap principle applies (using the following nonconstant 416.53/142.14 growth matrix-interpretation) 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 TcT has computed the following triangular matrix interpretation. 416.53/142.14 Note that the diagonal of the component-wise maxima of 416.53/142.14 interpretation-entries contains no more than 1 non-zero entries. 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [a](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [b](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [c](x1) = [1] x1 + [2] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 The order satisfies the following ordering constraints: 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [a(x1)] = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 >= [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 = [x1] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [a(b(x1))] = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 ? [1] x1 + [4] 416.53/142.14 = [b(b(c(a(c(a(x1))))))] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [b(x1)] = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 >= [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 = [x1] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [c(c(x1))] = [1] x1 + [4] 416.53/142.14 > [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 = [x1] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 416.53/142.14 certificate MAYBE. 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 Strict Trs: 416.53/142.14 { a(x1) -> x1 416.53/142.14 , a(b(x1)) -> b(b(c(a(c(a(x1)))))) 416.53/142.14 , b(x1) -> x1 } 416.53/142.14 Weak Trs: { c(c(x1)) -> x1 } 416.53/142.14 Obligation: 416.53/142.14 derivational complexity 416.53/142.14 Answer: 416.53/142.14 MAYBE 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 The weightgap principle applies (using the following nonconstant 416.53/142.14 growth matrix-interpretation) 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 TcT has computed the following triangular matrix interpretation. 416.53/142.14 Note that the diagonal of the component-wise maxima of 416.53/142.14 interpretation-entries contains no more than 1 non-zero entries. 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [a](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [b](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [c](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 The order satisfies the following ordering constraints: 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [a(x1)] = [1] x1 + [1] 416.53/142.14 > [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 = [x1] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [a(b(x1))] = [1] x1 + [1] 416.53/142.14 ? [1] x1 + [4] 416.53/142.14 = [b(b(c(a(c(a(x1))))))] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [b(x1)] = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 >= [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.14 = [x1] 416.53/142.14 416.53/142.14 [c(c(x1))] = [1] x1 + [2] 416.53/142.15 > [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.15 = [x1] 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 416.53/142.15 certificate MAYBE. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Strict Trs: 416.53/142.15 { a(b(x1)) -> b(b(c(a(c(a(x1)))))) 416.53/142.15 , b(x1) -> x1 } 416.53/142.15 Weak Trs: 416.53/142.15 { a(x1) -> x1 416.53/142.15 , c(c(x1)) -> x1 } 416.53/142.15 Obligation: 416.53/142.15 derivational complexity 416.53/142.15 Answer: 416.53/142.15 MAYBE 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The weightgap principle applies (using the following nonconstant 416.53/142.15 growth matrix-interpretation) 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 TcT has computed the following triangular matrix interpretation. 416.53/142.15 Note that the diagonal of the component-wise maxima of 416.53/142.15 interpretation-entries contains no more than 1 non-zero entries. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 [a](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 [b](x1) = [1] x1 + [1] 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 [c](x1) = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The order satisfies the following ordering constraints: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 [a(x1)] = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.15 >= [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.15 = [x1] 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 [a(b(x1))] = [1] x1 + [1] 416.53/142.15 ? [1] x1 + [2] 416.53/142.15 = [b(b(c(a(c(a(x1))))))] 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 [b(x1)] = [1] x1 + [1] 416.53/142.15 > [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.15 = [x1] 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 [c(c(x1))] = [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.15 >= [1] x1 + [0] 416.53/142.15 = [x1] 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 416.53/142.15 certificate MAYBE. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Strict Trs: { a(b(x1)) -> b(b(c(a(c(a(x1)))))) } 416.53/142.15 Weak Trs: 416.53/142.15 { a(x1) -> x1 416.53/142.15 , b(x1) -> x1 416.53/142.15 , c(c(x1)) -> x1 } 416.53/142.15 Obligation: 416.53/142.15 derivational complexity 416.53/142.15 Answer: 416.53/142.15 MAYBE 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 None of the processors succeeded. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Details of failed attempt(s): 416.53/142.15 ----------------------------- 416.53/142.15 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 2) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 None of the processors succeeded. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Details of failed attempt(s): 416.53/142.15 ----------------------------- 416.53/142.15 1) 'bsearch-matrix' failed due to the following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The input cannot be shown compatible 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 2) 'iteProgress' failed due to the following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Fail 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 3) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 None of the processors succeeded. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Details of failed attempt(s): 416.53/142.15 ----------------------------- 416.53/142.15 1) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 6' failed due to the 416.53/142.15 following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The input cannot be shown compatible 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 2) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 5' failed due to the 416.53/142.15 following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The input cannot be shown compatible 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 3) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 4' failed due to the 416.53/142.15 following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The input cannot be shown compatible 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 4) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 3' failed due to the 416.53/142.15 following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The input cannot be shown compatible 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 5) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 2' failed due to the 416.53/142.15 following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The input cannot be shown compatible 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 6) 'matrix interpretation of dimension 1' failed due to the 416.53/142.15 following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The input cannot be shown compatible 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 4) 'Fastest (timeout of 30 seconds)' failed due to the following 416.53/142.15 reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 2) 'bsearch-matrix (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 416.53/142.15 following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 The input cannot be shown compatible 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following 416.53/142.15 reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 4) 'iteProgress (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 416.53/142.15 following reason: 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Fail 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 416.53/142.15 Arrrr.. 416.78/142.25 EOF