YES(?,O(n^1)) 10.61/5.79 YES(?,O(n^1)) 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 10.61/5.79 certificate YES(?,O(n^1)). 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 Strict Trs: 10.61/5.79 { f(c(X, s(Y))) -> f(c(s(X), Y)) 10.61/5.79 , g(c(s(X), Y)) -> f(c(X, s(Y))) } 10.61/5.79 Obligation: 10.61/5.79 derivational complexity 10.61/5.79 Answer: 10.61/5.79 YES(?,O(n^1)) 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 TcT has computed the following matrix interpretation satisfying 10.61/5.79 not(EDA) and not(IDA(1)). 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 [1 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 [f](x1) = [0 0 0 0] x1 + [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 [1 0 0 0] [1 1 0 0] [1] 10.61/5.79 [c](x1, x2) = [0 0 0 0] x1 + [0 0 0 0] x2 + [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 1 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 [1 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 [s](x1) = [0 1 0 0] x1 + [1] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 [1 0 0 1] [1] 10.61/5.79 [g](x1) = [0 0 0 0] x1 + [1] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [1] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [1] 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 The order satisfies the following ordering constraints: 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 [f(c(X, s(Y)))] = [1 0 0 0] [1 1 0 0] [2] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] X + [0 0 0 0] Y + [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 > [1 0 0 0] [1 1 0 0] [1] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] X + [0 0 0 0] Y + [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 = [f(c(s(X), Y))] 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 [g(c(s(X), Y))] = [1 1 0 0] [1 1 0 0] [3] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] X + [0 0 0 0] Y + [1] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [1] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [1] 10.61/5.79 > [1 0 0 0] [1 1 0 0] [2] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] X + [0 0 0 0] Y + [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 [0 0 0 0] [0 0 0 0] [0] 10.61/5.79 = [f(c(X, s(Y)))] 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 10.61/5.79 Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1)) 10.77/5.81 EOF