YES(?,O(n^1))
1158.50/299.51	YES(?,O(n^1))
1158.50/299.51	
1158.50/299.51	We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
1158.50/299.51	certificate YES(?,O(n^1)).
1158.50/299.51	
1158.50/299.51	Strict Trs:
1158.50/299.51	  { 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1))))))))))
1158.50/299.51	  , 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1))))))))))))) }
1158.50/299.51	Obligation:
1158.50/299.51	  derivational complexity
1158.50/299.51	Answer:
1158.50/299.51	  YES(?,O(n^1))
1158.50/299.51	
1158.50/299.51	The problem is match-bounded by 3. The enriched problem is
1158.50/299.51	compatible with the following automaton.
1158.50/299.51	{ 0_0(1) -> 1
1158.50/299.51	, 0_1(6) -> 5
1158.50/299.51	, 0_1(9) -> 8
1158.50/299.51	, 0_2(26) -> 25
1158.50/299.51	, 0_2(29) -> 28
1158.50/299.51	, 0_2(32) -> 31
1158.50/299.51	, 0_3(47) -> 46
1158.50/299.51	, 0_3(50) -> 49
1158.50/299.51	, 0_3(53) -> 52
1158.50/299.51	, 0_3(59) -> 58
1158.50/299.51	, 0_3(62) -> 61
1158.50/299.51	, 0_3(68) -> 67
1158.50/299.51	, 0_3(71) -> 70
1158.50/299.51	, 0_3(74) -> 73
1158.50/299.51	, 1_0(1) -> 1
1158.50/299.51	, 1_1(2) -> 1
1158.50/299.51	, 1_1(2) -> 8
1158.50/299.51	, 1_1(4) -> 3
1158.50/299.51	, 1_1(5) -> 4
1158.50/299.51	, 1_1(7) -> 6
1158.50/299.51	, 1_1(10) -> 9
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(22) -> 5
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(22) -> 8
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(24) -> 23
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(25) -> 24
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(27) -> 26
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(28) -> 36
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(30) -> 29
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(33) -> 32
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(34) -> 5
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(34) -> 8
1158.50/299.51	, 1_2(36) -> 35
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(43) -> 31
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(45) -> 44
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(46) -> 45
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(48) -> 47
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(49) -> 45
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(51) -> 50
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(54) -> 53
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(55) -> 28
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(57) -> 56
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(58) -> 57
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(60) -> 59
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(63) -> 62
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(64) -> 25
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(66) -> 65
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(67) -> 66
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(69) -> 68
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(70) -> 66
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(72) -> 71
1158.50/299.51	, 1_3(75) -> 74
1158.50/299.51	, 2_0(1) -> 1
1158.50/299.51	, 2_1(1) -> 10
1158.50/299.51	, 2_1(2) -> 7
1158.50/299.51	, 2_1(3) -> 2
1158.50/299.51	, 2_1(4) -> 7
1158.50/299.51	, 2_1(5) -> 7
1158.50/299.51	, 2_1(8) -> 7
1158.50/299.51	, 2_2(2) -> 33
1158.50/299.51	, 2_2(5) -> 33
1158.50/299.51	, 2_2(22) -> 33
1158.50/299.51	, 2_2(23) -> 22
1158.50/299.51	, 2_2(28) -> 27
1158.50/299.51	, 2_2(31) -> 30
1158.50/299.51	, 2_2(34) -> 33
1158.50/299.51	, 2_2(35) -> 34
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(22) -> 51
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(34) -> 54
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(43) -> 63
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(44) -> 43
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(46) -> 48
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(49) -> 48
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(52) -> 51
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(55) -> 75
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(56) -> 55
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(58) -> 60
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(61) -> 60
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(65) -> 64
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(70) -> 69
1158.50/299.51	, 2_3(73) -> 72 }
1158.50/299.51	
1158.50/299.51	Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^1))
1159.05/300.07	EOF